Flagged for cheating

If carlsen play annonoumysly in this site, he would be banned the second day for cheating,,,and i think in this case chess.com would be correct.

its simple your playing in a match v someone who is say 1200 or plus and he beats you. then you play the game on say chess king or fritz to see where you went wrong. but you find out your not playing a human.you are playing someone who is imputting all the best moves from hes chess engine like fritz this is how you can tell its happened to me loads of time.

Examples?

one of my groups cheating forum went and looked at the games and found cheating was going on it all got reported and the people cheating got the boot. so chess.com is doing a good job.

Dude, how are that games you posted yours if at your profile, bullet stats show your highest rtg is 1672 and your bullet rtg in your posted games is 1800+? And one more question, Off Topic: how did you write 2500 posts in 2 mounths? Jeez!

I meant an example of the games. The last time I saw someone accuse his opponent of cheating, his opponent declined to take a free piece twice. It's tough to believe 1200s cheat very often yet remain at that rating. I barely even see much higher rated players cheat.

its happening all the time ture chess is otb

Waaaa

Roma, you have played close to 3,000 online games against opponents with an average rating of 1400. It just beggars belief that 1,000 or more of these people are making a chess engine's first choice move throughout their games. They would spend about one or two days at that rating doing that.

Are you sure you don't mean that 50% of your opponents found the engine's recommended move some of the time. Because, especially in the opening and in simple middle games, that is what you would expect.

What percentage of computer best moves did you discover that you make yourself?

it dont matter what level you are people cheat on chess.com.over the board is the only true chess. i cannot name names. but if you look at my record your see a lot of people kick off for cheating. thats the point im making.

OK

Although the fact that a number of your opponents have had their accounts closed for cheating takes us back to where the thread starts. Were they cheats? If the automated system works they were. But does it?

well i think chess.com are working with the best engines founding out the cheats. im not going to say they are 100% spot on. but the staff jobs are to look all the time and make this site number 1.

More power to their elbow then, Roma.

give it a break some of you way past paranoid

I have only been sure I've played against an engine a few times here.  Quite a few other times I have felt I was playing an engine during the game, but afterwards I found that my opponent had just found some good, but maybe fairly obvious moves, and I had played quite badly.  It is tempting when you lose to blame anything but yourself.

However, one of the many reasons I stopped doing rematches was that often my opponents played out of their skins in a second game, and that made me a bit suspicious.  I think some people want revenge so much that they wheel in a bit of help.

Sandbagging seems quite common though.  I often find myself playing players in the 1300s who find terrific moves. much better than most 1300s would find; when I look at their profiles, I find they have peaked at 1700 or higher.

Given how bad the chess.com analysis computer is, the mistakes might have been the kind of mistakes the computer makes.

Don't worry about this Shit.They're just jealous that they can never be as good as you. Oh and chess.com's computer analysis is Garbage btw.Made me laugh when I was a premium member.I remember one instance when there were 2 moves that Mated in 1.It gave one move # and the other move ?-lol.

For the other move it probably said: "Game should have continue"

Assuming the cheat icons in the archive are working, I only saw 3 players (5 games) over the past year. That is not a lot of people at your level.

That is bullet, my blitz rating is 1800+...