The reason why the OP started this thread is because he's having a sex change operation in the near future. I play cards with his doctor.
for all the girls on chess.com.....
Sort:
Jion_Wansu wrote:
What about ladies like Ashley Tapp? Will she be the "next" Magnus Carlsen...
holy crap fine as hell, need to match her asap
Dude, isn't she like 10?
I really wasn't going to add to this dire thread anymore but I'm feeling provoked. How you imagine it's OK to post the above in the context above deserves a slap Kasporov. You appear to do anything but respect female chess players. I'm starting to think guys like yourself (& you know who you are Ronald), can't get by without some sexist smutty innuendo which you like to believe hides the fact you are inadequate men.
Marcosite; your REALLY in left field about me. I have NO idea how you got that impression. I've never posted anything disrespecful towards females. Can you please explain where, how, and why you think I should be included in the same sentence as Kasparov Jr. He's a 17 yr old kid who's never gotten laid. I'm 58 and have better things to do than disrespect females. If I don't get back to you right away, give it a few hrs. I'll be helping some female neighbors today.
Ronald, you should have some idea otherwise we just post stuff and have no idea what or why. But I'll agree, Kasparov is far worse than you.
Why don't you enlighten me and find some of my post where I disrepected women.
"Excuse me sir! What seems to be your boggle ?"
marcosite wrote:
I really wasn't going to add to this dire thread anymore but I'm feeling provoked. How you imagine it's OK to post the above in the context above deserves a slap Kasporov. You appear to do anything but respect female chess players. I'm starting to think guys like yourself (& you know who you are Ronald), can't get by without some sexist smutty innuendo which you like to believe hides the fact you are inadequate men.
how is anything posted above wrong? I do respect female chess players, just not the one's who have to showboat for attention everywhere. The one's who constantly upload photos of themselves, create threads saying how they are girls, and post provacative avatars. They know exaxctly what they are doing, and anything done to them its' their fault. And now you are saying we are inadequate men for saying sexual innuendo remarks? Lol figures why your a 40 year old woman
<<<<I'm 58 and have better things to do than disrespect females.>>>>
I don't.
But then I'm 62. :P
Having just gotten clobbered for having a provocative avatar, I still want to know why Kasporov has not done anything to me. It seems to suggest that he has some self control and is wrong about saying males have none. Oh yes, and I am decidedly under 40. Not that age is remotely relevant.
By his reasoning, if I get a gun, go to the zoo, and shoot all the animals, that isn't my fault and doesn't count as animal cruelty, because humans have been conditioned by evolution to kill animals for food.
madhacker wrote:
By his reasoning, if I get a gun, go to the zoo, and shoot all the animals, that isn't my fault and doesn't count as animal cruelty, because humans have been conditioned by evolution to kill animals for food.
Flirting with a woman on a social network is not the same as killing animals in a zoo....
The moral, criminal, ethical, issues alone make the analogy a poor one.
Second, a natural urge to kill animals for food (an urge which is debatable regarding humans because humans are arguably built for vegetables, socialized in an environment not to kill animals, and tend not to look at an animal while hungry and think "Oh, food!") would not justify killing more than one needs to eat and killing that which belongs to someone else....
On the other hand, a natural urge to flirt with another (one that is debatable, but highly more reasonable given the perponderance of past interactions between human beings over these thousands of years where the only thing debatable is the definition of flirting) would justify flirting, which isn't excessive and harms no one....
NakedChick wrote:
Having just gotten clobbered for having a provocative avatar, I still want to know why Kasporov has not done anything to me. It seems to suggest that he has some self control and is wrong about saying males have none. Oh yes, and I am decidedly under 40. Not that age is remotely relevant.
Agree with you NakedChick & followed The Other Thread to it's rather bitter end. I don't think you'll ever know how certain members work. Take it as a compliment, maybe you scared him off!
@dmxn2k, it's hardly 'innocent flirting' that the OP is trying to justify here, it's more like persistent harassing. I accept that the analogy is flawed but I was just trying to make a point.
It's not so much a flawed analogy as one that may require a reader to ponder over it for half a second, which is quite a stretch on a chess site.
madhacker wrote:
By his reasoning, if I get a gun, go to the zoo, and shoot all the animals, that isn't my fault and doesn't count as animal cruelty, because humans have been conditioned by evolution to kill animals for food.
Indeed, it depends on how determinist you want to get about this :) "Don't punish me, I can't control who I am!"
And actually I'm not sure if it's easy to resolve this issue -- how far can you go to rid yourself of responsibility. After all, if you're mentally insane for instance you are treated more leniently. My intuition tells me that somehow, at some extreme, the argument has to break down (yet it's not easy to see the "how").
What about ladies like Ashley Tapp? Will she be the "next" Magnus Carlsen...
What about hot ladies like: