for all the girls on chess.com.....

Sort:
SilentKnighte5
TheMushroomDealer wrote:

It is also possible that most of people here are actually women who pretend to be males and those males who harrass women (5% or something) are the only ´true males` here. 

This seems likely.

Elubas

"Actions speak for themselves, and controlable or not, all actions have consequences"

Yeah I mean it's a wise post JGambit. But if I were to play devil's advocate I might just say you are making actions speak for themselves because you simply want them to. Clearly, when comparing the mindset of a murderer who is not very aware of what they are doing, compared to the mindset of one who is aware of what they are doing but just doesn't care, these two murderers are not equally bad/apathetic. So it would be a bit dishonest to pretend this kind of mitigation factor doesn't exist, even if it's unclear as to how much it applies or should apply.

I can certainly think of scenarios in which I wouldn't see the negativity of someone even if they did something that resulted in a bad outcome. If a person does some normal thing and by some coincidental chain reaction someone ends up dying, I wouldn't think the mindset of the person who "caused" it was any different from that of a normal person, but rather, the uncontrollable circumstances surrounding that person would be different. But circumstances don't have character traits.

madhacker
Elubas wrote:

We've had a pretty tragic example of this in the news in the last few days with the pilot intentionally crashing the plane.

Whilst clearly what he did was inexcusable and killed a lot of people, it's clear to me that the airline has to be held responsible as well for either not knowing or not caring that he was mentally ill.

FFx_RaZe04

What happens when a girl enters a room full of boys? the balance of the ecosystem will be broken haha. This is kinda what's happening to this site. We men are so desperate for women, espescially when you both have similarities (which is chess). It can't be avoided, For girls, this site is like their "fishing with compliments and attention" site (Not all girls though, i think just 50% of them). Their profiles are filled with pictures and many creeps post notes at her home page. Peace and kudos to you brothers. ^^

lilemu

CHESS.COM IS FOR MENFoot in Mouth

bluejibb

chess is fun to play

Nehaabbas092536
Chess. com is for everyone, not just for men.
Eleanor2003

lol

Eleanor2003

Eleanor2003 wrote:

lol

its true

Tamar_gymnast
The m n have been hitting on me like crazy
batgirl

No one harasses me.

Jonathan-Harker
zzz ZZZ zzz ZZZ......
bluejibb

women let men think that they rule the world

motherinlaw
bluejibb wrote:

women let men think that they rule the world

Ah, would that that were so ... 

Pashak1989

Things are very simple. 

 

1) Men should respect women regardless of how she is dressed or how she acts. If they want to approach her or try to flirt with her there appropriates ways and moments to do so. 

Those who harass women [should I have to be put in a position to censor out BLATANT inappropraite language??  -CrystalMoon] and say vulgar stuff are losers and will always be. 

 

2) People should realize that the way they portray themselves and the way they treat themselves is the exact same way others will portray and treat them. 

If a woman constantly post zoomed pics of their cleavage or butt they should not be surprised why men do not take them seriously and instead just want them for sex. 

They should not be surprised when tons of losers message them stuff like [Suffice it to say, I have no intentions of going to all this trouble again when muting is a much simpler option. -CrystalMoon]

Yes, it should not be like that, but losers will always act like that. It is what it is. 

When women post extremely provocative pics the message they are transmitting is [Language]

 

3) Just like TS says that women should not get surprised that so many men flirt with them, men should equally not be surprised at all when a girl rejects them or simply ignores them. It is for the very same reason. Women (Specially those who post their real photo and are attractive) get many many messages from men every single day in forums, social media and in every place they have that photo. You think they don't get tired of receiving the exact same stuff over and over and over again?? 

 

4) At the end of the day this is a chess forum (Even though more often than not it looks like a kindergarden forum), this is not a flirting forum. If a man wants to meet a girl there are many places that were designed for that. 

In real life he can go to bars or clubs, in Internet he can go to websites designed for that or he can even download apps like Tinder. It is ridiculous to expect that at a chess website a girl will have dirty talks with you. It is really stupid. 

 

 

Charlotte
Pashak1989 wrote:
 

your post would read better if you replaced the word 'losers' with [Racist comments are also disalowed in the forums -CrystalMoon]

Pashak1989

CrystalMoon, don't be ridiculous. The "inappropriate language" used was not directed at anybody, it was just used as an example of what desperate pervs write to women. 

 

If you are thirsty for censoring stuff and muting people, then go and mute all the people who spam with their ridiculous threads, aka "Count to 500", "Race to 100", 'Be yourself" etc. 

 

And please, your " I have no intentions of going to all this trouble again when muting is a much simpler option" is laughable. 

What trouble did you have to go through?? Delete 3 or 4 words is now a big trouble? Oh poor, I hope your fingers didn't fell off from making such a big effort. 

 

You want to mute me? Oh you have no idea how much you scared me!. LOL Mute me if you want, I could not care less. 

Nehaabbas092536
Hmm
CookedQueen

Hardly to understand the mods, so many 'easy' words replaced with a mod comment because they were treated as not appropriate and so many other places with bad accusations and insults just with a warning note attached and even once more copied the same bad insult by the same mods. Really disapointing.

 

And later on otherwhere one can read the treatment is the same, no it isn't. It depends on the mod and the user, not the case or rules.

Nehaabbas092536
I m not happy .