About 15% chess engines, but I don't allow myself takebacks against computers either.
Frequency of applying studies to computer opponent versus human?


Neurionb: I completely agree, I tried playing the shredder 11 engine at it's lowest elo just to see how weak it could "pretend" to be, and it was surprisingly weak, so it's good to see that the engine truly does scale down as well as it scales up.
Bobobbob: Shredder 11 allows you to toggle on "limit strength" whereby you can drop the elo as low as 850 I believe, and I think the engine caps out around 2500 or so, cant remember the peak (not at home right now).

I've recently started to wonder if I might be better off playing my chess engine (Shredder 11) more and human opponents a bit less while I'm studying concepts from a few chess books. The reason I ponder this is because the moment I make a mistake or mess up, I can simply start over and try to learn the concept again, rather than being dragged through the mud and pulled further from the academic study I was trying to learn in the first place.
What ratio do you guys play computer engines versus human opponents?
As of right now, I'd say only about 1% of my games do I play against computer engines, but that may be changing in the near future.