Freud and the Problem of Evil (Or the Plurality of Types)

Sort:
DrSpudnik

I don't know. Cosby certainly has staying power with the long streak of victims over decades. Wasn't Freud just doodling his niece....a few patients...hmmm. OK, he was pretty bad.

Mandy711

Cosby probably is a porn addict. And Freud reads Kamasutra and Perfumed Garden nightly Cool

FRENCHBASHER
Mandy711 a écrit :

The chess society is justt one of the human societies. Even in spiritual societies like monastery, convents, spiritual communes, etc., evil exist although much much less. The good news to all, happiness is possible dedpite the presence of evil.

+1 Concerning happiness, it is a gift, you may need time to get it, the moment you make difference with pleasure, it took me 60 years to get it : the pleasure was with my wife, the happiness without.Laughing.

Pleasure is often bound to money, happiness is not mesurable, Descartes had more pleasure in his poele (bibliothek) than many trekkers in Nepal or tourits in Venise. 

Freud suggested for other therapists no relations with patients, for himself, well. hmmm? I didn't carry the candle !

Cosby ? bad evil guy if it is truth, already condemned ?

don't forget Still, Nash and Young, great guys.Laughing

Evil without chess: in Saudi after Mufti's fatwa, no doubt!

Mandy711

@fb which is happier? the hermits of the himalayas, the monks in isolated monasteries, or the social workers serving the impoverished, old and sick, orphans and reforming former criminals and prostitutes?

FRENCHBASHER

well little bee, consider Himalaya , climate, variety of dishes, easy wy to go to school, oxygen rare, yak meat and milk, ... if not native, forget to be happy there, the first who came to Everest, my friend Mallory said :" I was there because it was there" ... and didn't stay.

Conside Grande Chartreuse, total monks isolation : if they were not drink like Chartreuse , Trappist beer, how could they stand isolated monasteries ? hmmm ?

Social worker serving the impoverish : the point is impoverish make plenty of children, truth, and it is like Danaid tonneau, the more you help the more you created poverty, Malthus said that, and is hated, because it is ..the truth.

Helping old? they are getting elder, you move the problem, and ..cost?

Helping sick ? if they go back to poverty, is it progress, is it better ? save ne guy from suicide, he comes back following day with his bills to you to pay it. Truth : the paradox KUAN of helping. (I needed 60years to get it).

Prostitutes : we do agree, the ONLY useful way to be happy.

It is some stoician school of thinking here, I don't think I'm the truth, everyoe has to find way to happiness, little bee.

hmmm ... hmmmm... ahoummm.. ahummm  ..atchoum!Laughing

Mandy711

lol! FB, we share the same beliefs of helping young orphans as best welfare service. If they are well taken care of, well educated, well ddisciplined, they would not grow up to become poor, sickly, criminals or prostitutes. Prevention is better than cure 😊

FRENCHBASHER

yes