Fundamentals of chessology
Sort:
Mishalsilva123
Apr 9, 2024
0
#1
Starting off, chess is a board game distinguished with various pieces in the elementary cause of bringing evilness to the opponents tactics.
It is the most craziest yet crucial pathway to a mind that confronts tactics with tactics: a brain of a strategist.
My opinion regarding the calculative movements mainly depend on the hierarchy of how you use the. You could capture a hanging piece and cease its power, or else you could do a much better move, like finding a way to land a check or quickly assembling a unseen checkmate. The fact is that it mainly focuses on your strategy and not on your own personal raw ideologies. Many famous war strategists like Winston Churchill, played chess and got the mere ideology of enemies position during a crisis .
Further more, you could also notice the factual title on each gambit holds, like the Dutch Stonewall, it was a real tactic used by the people in Dutch. Chess adapted that name and reigned to the exact formation used during that war.
Another ideology I want to seduce on to the people studying the science of chess is that the art of beating others does not mean you are very bright or a casual player. It does hoard any brightness in you if you dismantle your own progressive way: you should be able to know the attacks of any kind. I personally go to the concept of identifying my opponents gambit, whether it’s the Vienna game or the King's Indian Defense, I apprehend the total aggregation in my mind to figure the gambits used by my opponent. If my strategy is futile and doesn't go with the opponent's gambit, I quickly engage the game on the way I want. For an example, we know that the Queen's gambit and the London System won't work. The London System specializes on assembling the required pieces; first the bishop, then the protection of it by the pawn, and then the two knights guarding the field game both outside and inside the Kingdom , and finally, the castling to your left. The Queen's Gambit focuses on customising only the pawns and seconded by a single bishop. If you ask me, Queen's Gambit with also the assist of the secondary knights are better than The London, although there are risks associated with the lesser pieces on the assemble. However, far more than The Queen's Gambit or the mighty Scandinavian Defense, my preference goes to King's Indian Defense ( only if I am playing black ) or else the Bird's opening.
