Game 4 Engine evaluations

proved wrong.

Stockfish 4 was evaluating Carlsen a win?

You might need to post the evaluation and the line to prove the wrong-proving.

I was just trying to tell the stockfish evaluting-0.8 to -1.66 throughout the game after Carlsen got one pawn advantage in the middle game.

Computers are notoriously materialistic

In game 3 Stockfish also saw Anand way ahead when he could have taken the pawn on b2 while Carlsens Queen was chilling on h1.

I said last night in a chat room that Anand always had practical compensation in a game between humans: a complex position in which Anand had activity and coordination while being a pawn down. At most Carlsen's advantage at any point was -0.75. The computer assessments were just plain stupid. It helps to have a brain rather than just a microchip.