Game Analysis and Review

I've discovered very transparent errors by Chess.com in their game review and/or analysis. I'm guessing, just guessing it's due to poor programming. Anybody else experience this?

Can you provide examples?

The review strength you have, or depth on standalone analysis, will determine how accurate it gets. In general, the majority of the time it's going to be very accurate, with that depth limitation, but the coach/text may occasionally have some bugs still.

Oh yeah. It's telling me I should have captured a pawn with a pawn instead of losing my bishop to a pawn in another line. Makes no sense. Lots of that in game analysis

Can you provide a link to the game? It's likely you missed something in the analysis.