Games or Books?
"... [annotated games are] infinitely more useful than bare game scores. However, annotated games vary widely in quality. Some are excellent study material. Others are poor. But the most numerous fall into a third category - good-but-wrong-for-you. ... You want games with annotations that answer the questions that baffle you the most. ..." - GM Andrew Soltis (2010)
"... [annotated games are] infinitely more useful than bare game scores. However, annotated games vary widely in quality. Some are excellent study material. Others are poor. But the most numerous fall into a third category - good-but-wrong-for-you. ... You want games with annotations that answer the questions that baffle you the most. ..." - GM Andrew Soltis (2010)
Studying the annotated brilliant games of Morphy, Tal, Kasparov, etc not only makes you a better player... creative too. The beauty of chess is in creativity... not just winning.
Studying the annotated brilliant games of Morphy, Tal, Kasparov, etc not only makes you a better player... creative too. The beauty of chess is in creativity... not just winning.
Yes. Annotated. I'll be direct. Choose annotated games over instructive chess books. Sorry... chess books authors.
Depends on the book (and the person doing the learning)?
"... now lets assume I'm talking about one of that good books you keep on posting on the threads..." - tipish (~7 hours ago)
"... If it’s instruction, you look for an author that addresses players at your level (buying something that’s too advanced won’t help you at all). This means that a classic book that is revered by many people might not be useful for you. ..." - IM Jeremy Silman (2015)
https://www.chess.com/article/view/the-best-chess-books-ever
"... The books that are most highly thought of are not necessarily the most useful. Go with those that you find to be readable. ..." - GM Nigel Davies (2010)
"... [annotated games are] infinitely more useful than bare game scores. However, annotated games vary widely in quality. Some are excellent study material. Others are poor. But the most numerous fall into a third category - good-but-wrong-for-you. ... You want games with annotations that answer the questions that baffle you the most. ..." - GM Andrew Soltis (2010)
I think Soltis had it in mind that, as part of the process of becoming a better player, one should ask oneself questions about what was going on in the game.
Yes. Annotated. I'll be direct. Choose annotated games over instructive chess books. Sorry... chess books authors.
Pawn Power is a respected book, but not approved by everyone.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708110136/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review249.pdf
Art of Attack is also respected.
http://theweekinchess.com/john-watson-reviews/assorted-recent-books
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708234424/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/aac.pdf
There are alternatives for Attack and Pawn study. Whether it is just the games or the books or alternative books, the amount of learning will depend on the learner.