Im still trying to figure out what complusory means
best of 3 should be complusory!
Sort:
All the clouds turn to words
All the words float in sequence
No one knows what they mean
Everyone just ignores them
May 12, 2019
0
#24
IMBacon wrote:
Im still trying to figure out what complusory means
When you claim your opponent cheated with a engine, you have a case of losing to a computer, or in concise terminology, complusory.
May 12, 2019
0
#25
Pulpofeira wrote:
Ziryab escribió:
johno101 wrote:
wow! never say never good luck to you
There is no luck in chess, so you are supposed to tell your opponent, "good luck". But, don't say "good game," if you beat me, because it was obviously garbage on my part. I always say good game after my opponent drops a queen.
In other words, don't take yourself so seriously. This request for rematches is an example of taking yourself too seriously. Just play chess. If you play enough, you will play the same opponents multiple games over time. There's one player here I've played over 400 games. I do know him IRL.
I've played the good old @MSC157 exactly 400 games. scoring an amazing 29%.
I played a match against @MSC157--two correspondence games. Neither of us could find a win.
May 12, 2019
0
#26
I neither give nor ask for rematches. I don't chat. I just play chess... lousy blitz chess, but chess nonetheless.
May 12, 2019
0
#27
rematch should be obligatory - hand people a game and then they disappear; cowards; too many [censored] around here
May 12, 2019
0
#28
henk_glimlach wrote:
rematch should be obligatory - hand people a game and then they disappear; cowards; too many [censored] around here
rematch should be banned - hand people a loss and then they feel entitled to try again; egomaniacs; too many [censored] around here
May 12, 2019
0
#29
Rematches should be banned — hand people a loss and then they feel entitled to try again. Egomaniacs; too many [censored] around here.
May 12, 2019
0
#31
"Whenever I lose I must have rematches!",
The Patzer repeatedly, heatedly cried.
He continued to lose still more games in batches,
And rematched and rematched until he died.
May 12, 2019
0
#32
blueemu wrote:
"Whenever I lose I must have rematches!",
The Patzer repeatedly, heatedly cried.
He continued to lose still more games in batches,
And rematched and rematched until he died.
Ziryab escribió:
Pulpofeira wrote:
Ziryab escribió:
johno101 wrote:
wow! never say never good luck to you
There is no luck in chess, so you are supposed to tell your opponent, "good luck". But, don't say "good game," if you beat me, because it was obviously garbage on my part. I always say good game after my opponent drops a queen.
In other words, don't take yourself so seriously. This request for rematches is an example of taking yourself too seriously. Just play chess. If you play enough, you will play the same opponents multiple games over time. There's one player here I've played over 400 games. I do know him IRL.
I've played the good old @MSC157 exactly 400 games. scoring an amazing 29%.
I played a match against @MSC157--two correspondence games. Neither of us could find a win.
The kid is good.
How it was?
May 12, 2019
0
#36
Oh, well, not all at once 
Maybe at most we played 100 in a single day, but we did this for a few weekends.
Ah, long time controls, I see. If I'd play those vs the kid my score would be maybe 1 per cent.
May 12, 2019
0
#38
I guess that's sarcastic. Yeah, they were 3 minute games or faster. I've lost about 30 against him, but often one or both of us were screwing around in various ways, so it's not a totally serious result.
I see he's not very fond of the queen's pawn. Well, I don't go around saying 1. e4??, I prefer 1. d4!! instead, less offensive. 
That's now how you pronounce compulsory.