even after spending 3 hours a day on chess i can't improve my USCF

Sort:
Avatar of HorkstowGrange

What tournaments are you playing in?

Avatar of krazeechess
AbhaySankar12 wrote:

What tournaments are you playing in?

how does that have anything to do with this and i don't want to reveal my name or location

Avatar of Zycirline

Your opponents are also improving you know

i just probably lost a bunch of points as I lost to a 1500 and 1400 in a five round tournament

Avatar of SparkFight

you are not playing well

Avatar of SparkFight
AbhaySankar12 wrote:

What tournaments are you playing in?

it does matter

Avatar of gosuz

Play better chess over the board and stop losing grin.png

Avatar of pianazy
B1ZMARK wrote:

Your opponents are also improving you know

i just probably lost a bunch of points as I lost to a 1500 and 1400 in a five round tournament

If they beat u why are they still 1400 and 1500 

Avatar of Moonwarrior_1

F

Avatar of jpaul_lyons

Don’t worry about the rating. Just worry about chess and let the rating take care of itself. 

Avatar of krazeechess
Mr-Mudd wrote:
krazeechess wrote:
AbhaySankar12 wrote:

What tournaments are you playing in?

how does that have anything to do with this and i don't want to reveal my name or location

Well why'd you make this post ya dingus!?  Ya want insight from others or not?  You're probably not improving because you won't accept help.

 

bruh i've made better forums regarding improvement than you ever will

Avatar of krazeechess
DigitalWarfare wrote:

Honestly? You know I'm working at this full time currently and I don't see how you can make rapid progress only working on Chess three hours a day. Your competition is working harder and in many cases - has a lot more experience. You need to outwork them in order to surpass them. 

i thought 3 hours was a lot

Avatar of krazeechess
Batman2508 wrote:
AbhaySankar12 wrote:

What tournaments are you playing in?

it does matter

how?

Avatar of krazeechess

see look i didn't win against this 1600 USCF because i missed  a simple tactic. I feel like I could have found that same tactic in a normal chess.com game. Is this because of something like pressure or a mindset whenever I play uscf games?

Avatar of krazeechess
DigitalWarfare wrote:
krazeechess wrote:
DigitalWarfare wrote:

Honestly? You know I'm working at this full time currently and I don't see how you can make rapid progress only working on Chess three hours a day. Your competition is working harder and in many cases - has a lot more experience. You need to outwork them in order to surpass them. 

i thought 3 hours was a lot

 

Not even remotely. There are guys playing multiple 45+45's and/or 90+30's online, every day, in some cases. That's just their playtime. They study obsessively, too. Tactics, endgames, theory, master games. The higher your rating goes, the harder they work, the more time they spend. That's Chess. 

But no - three hours a day, on average, is absolutely nothing. That would be a light workload for Call of Duty. 

How much is a reasonable time that I should spend playing/studying chess everyday? I will keep increasing this as I become better and better.

Avatar of EamonB1
krazeechess wrote:

I can't. Before everyone says "Your practicing wrong" and "You aren't improving", I know that I am improving because all my online ratings are going up. However, I just can't improve my online USCF rating. I'm not looking for an explanation by looking at my games, I'm looking for a general cause for this type of thing. Here is my chart:

Here are the dates:

As you can see, in a total of 9 months, my rating only went up 60 points. Plus, after the tournament I just played, my rating will probably be 1275. I don't know why I have this curse of not improving my uscf rating.

Did you ever take onto consideration that:

A) You're not the only one improving

B) Your eyes are probably hardwired for looking at a virtual board, not a 3D one.

Avatar of llama47

If you're 1700 blitz (and rapid) here, I think you should not be doing that badly.

It doesn't matter if someone is spending 100 hours a day on chess, if they're rated 1200 then they're 1200 and you should be better than them during the time of that game.

---

Maybe show us a game? Are you being outplayed? My guess is you're not. My guess is at the beginning of the game you think you should have a winning position by move 15 or 20, so you make risky / silly moves... and then those moves don't work out.

I played a 1300 OTB not too long ago. You know what the strategy is for players like me who are much higher rated? Just to play a long game. It doesn't matter if the position is equal on move 20, it doesn't matter if it's equal on move 40... as long as the game goes on, they'll eventually blunder something. My job isn't to try to win, my job is to keep a solid position for a long time and wait for an opportunity.

If you had a mindset like that I wonder how you'd do.

Avatar of krazeechess
DigitalWarfare wrote:
krazeechess wrote:
DigitalWarfare wrote:
krazeechess wrote:
DigitalWarfare wrote:

Honestly? You know I'm working at this full time currently and I don't see how you can make rapid progress only working on Chess three hours a day. Your competition is working harder and in many cases - has a lot more experience. You need to outwork them in order to surpass them. 

i thought 3 hours was a lot

 

Not even remotely. There are guys playing multiple 45+45's and/or 90+30's online, every day, in some cases. That's just their playtime. They study obsessively, too. Tactics, endgames, theory, master games. The higher your rating goes, the harder they work, the more time they spend. That's Chess. 

But no - three hours a day, on average, is absolutely nothing. That would be a light workload for Call of Duty. 

How much is a reasonable time that I should spend playing/studying chess everyday? I will keep increasing this as I become better and better.

 

You need to increase it in order to become better - not as. That's the point. 

Reasonable is entirely subjective. What was a reasonable amount of time spent on basketball to Michael Jordan is overly obsessive to the point of insanity to almost anyone else. The same would hold true in any venue. You get what you put in. There's no time limit and there are no rules to improvement. Feel free to spend 18 hours a day on this if it makes you happy. 

alright...

Avatar of krazeechess
EamonB1 wrote:
krazeechess wrote:

I can't. Before everyone says "Your practicing wrong" and "You aren't improving", I know that I am improving because all my online ratings are going up. However, I just can't improve my online USCF rating. I'm not looking for an explanation by looking at my games, I'm looking for a general cause for this type of thing. Here is my chart:

Here are the dates:

As you can see, in a total of 9 months, my rating only went up 60 points. Plus, after the tournament I just played, my rating will probably be 1275. I don't know why I have this curse of not improving my uscf rating.

Did you ever take onto consideration that:

A) You're not the only one improving

B) Your eyes are probably hardwired for looking at a virtual board, not a 3D one.

when i say "USCF" I mean online regular USCF which is online classical

Avatar of llama47
B1ZMARK wrote:

Your opponents are also improving you know

i just probably lost a bunch of points as I lost to a 1500 and 1400 in a five round tournament

Maybe kids who learn online have a (temporary) weakness OTB? I don't know.

Avatar of krazeechess
llama47 wrote:

If you're 1700 blitz (and rapid) here, I think you should not be doing that badly.

It doesn't matter if someone is spending 100 hours a day on chess, if they're rated 1200 then they're 1200 and you should be better than them during the time of that game.

---

Maybe show us a game? Are you being outplayed? My guess is you're not. My guess is at the beginning of the game you think you should have a winning position by move 15 or 20, so you make risky / silly moves... and then those moves don't work out.

I played a 1300 OTB not too long ago. You know what the strategy is for players like me who are much higher rated? Just to play a long game. It doesn't matter if the position is equal on move 20, it doesn't matter if it's equal on move 40... as long as the game goes on, they'll eventually blunder something. My job isn't to try to win, my job is to keep a solid position for a long time and wait for an opportunity.

If you had a mindset like that I wonder how you'd do.

All of my last 4 games were online USCF rated. They were G70 + 5.