How is chess good for the human brain?

Sort:
Bruks777

Smos-555 wrote:

Lets all go back on topic, now this is a bit of a personal question. Does anyone here want to become a doctor one day?

yes

Bruks777

Smos-555 wrote:

Lets all go back on topic, now this is a bit of a personal question. Does anyone here want to become a doctor one day?

yes

CP6033
JustJackinIt wrote:
Chess is not the toughest game to understand. I believe Go takes that prize. Also, a person cannot possibly think of all the possible combinations on any given move. Again, chess is simply game, that's all. It's not this special brain training thing or something only made for "smart people. It's a game that anyone can play, anyone can be good at, even "stupid" people. People need to stop making chess more than it is. It's a fun game that we enjoy, why make it anything more?

 

"Toughest to understand" is entirely subjective, and the best one can do is put games in categories (chess and go are clearly more challenging to understand than tic tac toe for example).

That aside, I see two problems with your line of thinking. Firstly, the question was not "is chess for smart people?", it was "Is chess good for your brain?". Those are two different questions. I think it's quite clear that chess helps improve cognitive ability, and teaches people how to be able to concentrate, calculate, and how to rely on intuition. Most people, like you said, play chess for fun, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have any value in developing skills that can be used in other areas of life.

Secondly, you are correct that chess is not only for smart people, but it is a game that challenges people intellectually (which is part of the appeal of it for me). If you do not wish to face great challenge on the way to improvement, then chess is not the game for you.

Smos-555
Bruks777 wrote:

 

Smos-555 wrote:

 

Lets all go back on topic, now this is a bit of a personal question. Does anyone here want to become a doctor one day?

 

yes

 

What kind of doctor?

Smos-555
brianchesscake wrote:

in order to win a chess game you don't have to play perfectly, only better than your opponent.

Your right, I agree with this 

Smos-555
CP6033 wrote:
JustJackinIt wrote:
Chess is not the toughest game to understand. I believe Go takes that prize. Also, a person cannot possibly think of all the possible combinations on any given move. Again, chess is simply game, that's all. It's not this special brain training thing or something only made for "smart people. It's a game that anyone can play, anyone can be good at, even "stupid" people. People need to stop making chess more than it is. It's a fun game that we enjoy, why make it anything more?

 

"Toughest to understand" is entirely subjective, and the best one can do is put games in categories (chess and go are clearly more challenging to understand than tic tac toe for example).

That aside, I see two problems with your line of thinking. Firstly, the question was not "is chess for smart people?", it was "Is chess good for your brain?". Those are two different questions. I think it's quite clear that chess helps improve cognitive ability, and teaches people how to be able to concentrate, calculate, and how to rely on intuition. Most people, like you said, play chess for fun, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have any value in developing skills that can be used in other areas of life.

Secondly, you are correct that chess is not only for smart people, but it is a game that challenges people intellectually (which is part of the appeal of it for me). If you do not wish to face great challenge on the way to improvement, then chess is not the game for you.

Those who want to face challenge will be able to succeed greatly. 

Smos-555

Chess is a game that encourages bravery, it makes people take risk. 

Smos-555
drmrboss wrote:
Smos-555 wrote:

Lets all go back on topic, now this is a bit of a personal question. Does anyone here want to become a doctor one day?

I am a doctor. I had to drop playing serious chess and OTB tourments in medical school as it was a considerable waste of time.  I am now playing chess online off and on. 

That is what a lot of parents think. Chess could be a waste of time if its not getting you anywhere. 

bong711

The benefits of chess is overrated. Jigsaw puzzles, Rubiks cubes, Crosswords puzzles are better for the brain. Chess fanaticism leads to insanity.

Smos-555
Infidel-Cattro wrote:

to win a chess game you just need to play against a bigger idiot.

In other words a player who is a worse player than you. 

YureaLily

yeaa it's good for the brain but if you only play chess and do nothing else your good brain won't have any good use anyway

 

Smos-555

True, lets just put it as multitasking 

Smos-555

Chess is just good for relaxing and studying 

bong711

Would a doctor makes an above average chess player?

drmrboss
Smos-555 wrote:
drmrboss wrote:
Smos-555 wrote:

Lets all go back on topic, now this is a bit of a personal question. Does anyone here want to become a doctor one day?

I am a doctor. I had to drop playing serious chess and OTB tourments in medical school as it was a considerable waste of time.  I am now playing chess online off and on. 

That is what a lot of parents think. Chess could be a waste of time if its not getting you anywhere. 

I was really struggling for my time to play tournament chess. I played chess to get money in my university student life in Myanmar. Chess clubs hire good chess players for their clubs for club championship tournaments. . One tournaments usually take 7-9 days. If I play 3 to 4 tournaments in a year, I miss classes for 4 weeks - 5 weeks. Later, I chose a different better way to get money during uni life.  My rank was somewhere around top 100-200 I guess. Even top 10 Titled players could not get proper money for their living. It made me hopeless for playing chess.

 

harbi_canoshi

I had not realised, your question was rhetorical. You answer your own question, as you like.

Sorry_Not_Smart

Probably some law of diminishing returns.  After you memorize a lot and find the BEST solution a draw when playing a good player in a game over 15-minutes, it does seem a little insane. I have only been playing a month or so, and the computer seems to be as good as anyone I will ever play.  So, to me, chess let's me interact with other players around the world, and that's fun.  It feels better to beat someone at chess than at, say, Call of Duty.  And when that endorphin rush runs out, then maybe I'll take a break.  It also depends how old you are, if playing chess stops you from working, etc.....if you are very young or very old, there might be more benefits.  

Smos-555
bong711 wrote:

Would a doctor makes an above average chess player?

Unless that chess player is a GM or a famous one, then yes. 

Smos-555
Sorry_Not_Smart wrote:

Probably some law of diminishing returns.  After you memorize a lot and find the BEST solution a draw when playing a good player in a game over 15-minutes, it does seem a little insane. I have only been playing a month or so, and the computer seems to be as good as anyone I will ever play.  So, to me, chess let's me interact with other players around the world, and that's fun.  It feels better to beat someone at chess than at, say, Call of Duty.  And when that endorphin rush runs out, then maybe I'll take a break.  It also depends how old you are, if playing chess stops you from working, etc.....if you are very young or very old, there might be more benefits.  

It has more benefits for old people then younger ones. 

Smos-555

Young people need to focus on their doctor career.