I would estimate that I, as a 1400 rated Rapid player (with a slightly crazy playing style), could probably a double brilliant every 700 games or so? I could go wrong, for better or worse.
yeah, but not double, more like single ngl
I would estimate that I, as a 1400 rated Rapid player (with a slightly crazy playing style), could probably a double brilliant every 700 games or so? I could go wrong, for better or worse.
yeah, but not double, more like single ngl
thats right im talking about double brilliant i literally get a brilliant every 3 - 5 games in rapid chess
thats right im talking about double brilliant i literally get a brilliant every 3 - 5 games in rapid chess
well those brilliants aren't valid, also we're doing an average?
not an excuse to flex digital numbers??
not an excuse just telling you MY average. i dont know why you seem so offended by every comment. this is why i unfriended you
not an excuse just telling you MY average. i dont know why you seem so offended by every comment. this is why i unfriended you
why did you block me and continue to post here?
thats just stupid luca, go away buffoon, and im not offended, im just saying you're wrong, you seem offended by your language, go play hide and seek kid jeez.
i get one every 200 bullet games or 20 rapid games i think
no?
it's like one in every 1000 games according to chess.com
dawg... those are my statistics not chess.com. brilliant moves get more common the higher rating you are because 2000s have far better tactical vision than 1000s
statistics are more accurate than Luca pointing fingers.
also nobody gives a crap about tactical vision
bro why are you always SO ANNOYING when someone actually wants to ANSWER YOUR QUESTION?
ITS LIKE YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER RIGHT? BECAUSE WHEN SOMEONE WANTS TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION YOU ALWAYS SAY IM WRONG AND YOU ARE RIGHT
if you already know chess.com stats are 1 in 1000 games then WHY EVEN ASK THE QUESTION
im so tired of your crap
woahhh dawg chill my question was for A DOUBLEEEEE
not a single brilliancy.