TACTICAS falso planteamiento del enigma
Sort:
Jul 15, 2018
0
#3
It’s not rigged, RealMadridTheLegend. Each tactic only has one answer, and if you don’t believe me then click the analysis answer the next time you think there are multiple answers.
The engine will tell you exactly why there is only one viable solution/why your alternatives do not work. Also, the rating goes up and down based on:
1. Your rating in relation to the problem’s rating
2. The amount of time it takes for you to solve the problem
3. Whether you get the question completely incorrect, partially correct, or totally correct.
Sure your tactics rating may fluctuate a lot at times, but you are the one doing the tactics and earning/losing the points. So don’t blame the tactics system.
The engine will tell you exactly why there is only one viable solution/why your alternatives do not work. Also, the rating goes up and down based on:
1. Your rating in relation to the problem’s rating
2. The amount of time it takes for you to solve the problem
3. Whether you get the question completely incorrect, partially correct, or totally correct.
Sure your tactics rating may fluctuate a lot at times, but you are the one doing the tactics and earning/losing the points. So don’t blame the tactics system.
José Luis
had a bad day.
Ligar is to link?!
RealMadridTheLegend wrote:
The correct translation of "ligar" is to pick up, to flirt...
It was Google. I thought that it would help since 99.9% of the people here don't speak Spanish.
I can see now that your post was not serious.
RealMadridTheLegend wrote:
I speak and understand english fluenly
"Fluenly"? Hmm, are you interested in talking about problems with the tactics training here?
I saw how well that discussion went with Spanish speakers...
https://www.chess.com/es/forum/view/general/foro-en-espanol?page=11
RealMadridTheLegend wrote:
oh, Jhonny, be good
Your anger and frustration moved me. I tried to help.
Evidently you weren't serious. You haven't addressed problems with tactics...
No estoy seguro, pero creo que no es del todo así. La puntuación que obtienes de las tácticas depende del tiempo que tardes en resolverlas. Si tardas 5 minutos en resolver una táctica simple obtienes muy pocos puntos. No solo se busca que las sepas resolver, sino la rapidez con que lo hagas.
Yo suelo hacer tacticas, y es cierto que a veces parece haber dos o más soluciones, pero sólo una es la mejor. Por ejemplo si hay una linea donde tienes mate en 2 y haces una jugada en la que tienes mate en tres, en una partida real no habría problema porque darías mate de todas formas (en una jugada más) pero en las tácticas se busca la respuesta óptima.
Hasta donde sé, las tácticas son repasadas por gente preparada y comprobadas con software de análisis para que siempre haya una respuesta que sea sensiblemente mejor que las demás.
You ridiculed the writer, however. I see nothing wrong with what he said.
Translation:
It is absolutely surprising that in this forum no one openly criticizes the tactical system of chess.com, which I consider, without any ambiguity, an authentic shame; The support girls tell me that they are working on a new tactical system. Lie. They have been promising that for years and the truth is that no improvement has been introduced. The tactics are very elaborate and convoluted and can have perfectly two or more possible solutions, but if your solution does not match the solution of the central computer emulation of chess com, ZAS, it takes away 13 points. On the other hand if you hit a tactic you get two points. Crazy. You can spend a whole day of training with tactics and how much more you play less points you will have. It is clear that what they pursue who have designed this shit, for which we pay $ 100 a year, just seek to hook you and become a gambler. But what surprises me most is that I do not see complaints in the x on these shit tactics, and this would confirm my suspicions, a minimum percentage of players are those who play in chess com to learn and train seriously. The vast majority believe that they are here in social networks, to link or go to know for what.