22563 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Many times when i get a pawn accross and at the game is close it is not feasible to take the queen because ofthe crappy way this site has programed their game. if you are .2 seconds ahead and just need the queen to check mate your opponent I have to double click on the piece (usually queen ) to get it. My clock does not stop even though it is no longer my move as i have just moved my pawn to my opponents border. During the selection time my clock in bullet is still spinning and I loose critical time. This seems to be about as logical as the Germans and French comengling their currencies with broke socialist countries via the EURO. Is this normal or just poor programing on the part of chess.com? When the game is very close i will not take the queen as it will cost me the game when I just positioned myself to get another valuable piece. I would like to compensate this site for the use of it but i just cannot pay for something this stupid and senseless. What is the correct way for this to be structured ie the clock stops when you put down your pawn and the game resumes when you get your piece and it is then your opponents move?
You can set it to autoqueen, so that when you do that, you don't have to choose a queen. Unfortunately, this can lead to stalemate once ina while, which is unfortunate
Can uou tell me how to set it? i just lost another one not 15 minutes ago.
Sounds like you are simply losing on time and don't think it's fair. There's nothing wrong with the site.
In some rare ocasions, queening instead of underpromoting can lead not just to stalemate, but also to defeat. Here is an example:
Of course, if you are playing really fast games, it is better to take the risk and just set it to auto promoting to queen. Situations like the one above are very rare.
"Nakamura vs Vachier-Lagrave: GM Blitz Battle Chess"
How you succeed in chess & life?
by Sanjeet_Yadav a few minutes ago
What if you saw more than the board?
by Ash_E 2 minutes ago
More on ChessBazaar's Latvian Set
by cgrau 3 minutes ago
kid stuck in ratings rut - advice?
by richie_and_oprah 7 minutes ago
by richie_and_oprah 9 minutes ago
White to move. What would you do?
by AussieRookie 11 minutes ago
Millionaire Chess 3
by richie_and_oprah 12 minutes ago
What do you say when people ask how good at chess you are ?
by akafett 13 minutes ago
8/24/2016 - Shock And Awe
by Newba 14 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by richie_and_oprah 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!