13358 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
There has been go reseatrch all the way to sixties. Progress has judt been very slow. And success really requred amount of computing power that would have been impractical even 1997.
Let alone the very basic idea of how to do chess program really did not change during that 40 years. While in most avenues had to be abandoned since they were dead ends
Go is far easier for algorithmical compression than chess and prior to 1997, nobody gave a shit about computer Go.
It took 40 years (1957 - 1997) and best IT scientist's effort to beat human champion in chess.
It took only 19 years (1997 - 2016) and amateurish research to beat human Go champion.
For a minimum truth, let's say: It took only 19 years (1997 - 2016) and amateurish research on top of 40 years (1957 - 1997) and best IT scientist's effort to beat human Go champion
OK, let's be more precise.
First complete chess program appeared in 1941, and human champion lost in 1997.*
First complete Go program appeared in 1968, and human champion lost in 2016.**
*Kasparov was declining already, underestimating artificial opponent, and there may have been a few GMs more competent (Anand, Shirov, Karpov).
**Very few of elite programmers were ever focused on Go.
It's more like - money for nothing vs nothing for money -.
Now, that's the right information.
Many avenues had to be abandoned since they weren't interested in actual AI
Yeah, chess programs weren't much stronger than the best humans until years later. There were some matches drawn in the mid 2000s.
and to put into context. Hardware needed to beat Lee Sedol
The version of AlphaGo that played against Lee used a similar amount of computing power as in the match against Fan Hui, where it used 1,202 CPUs and 176 GPUs.
Long long time anyone can get pro-level opponent onthe home computer
What's the difference between a Super GM and a GM?
by noura233 a few minutes ago
I loved my game.
by DonaldoTrump 5 minutes ago
Was that person really a hacker?
by AlexCampbell 9 minutes ago
by Boyangzhao 11 minutes ago
Starting a Chess Library
by CornerPawn 13 minutes ago
First time playing this opening. Went well :)
by skhar 13 minutes ago
How long did it take you to cross 1500?
by Wsk 18 minutes ago
7/29/2016 - Methodical Victory
by pnn08 18 minutes ago
Am I a physicist?
by Knight_Terror 18 minutes ago
Solid Opening for Black against e4
by JuergenWerner 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!