Ratio isn't as important as quality of your work. If quality of you work is low...then your "training" is rather waste of time. Period.
Okay, thanks for that. What makes for optimum training? And given that training is at the optimum quality, is worth considering a ratio? If so, what would that be?
Thanks again.
Hi Kevin, I found the following resources useful, when trying to respond to such question:
1) The free e.book you can download towards the bottom of the page here: https://nextlevelchess.blog/books/
2) The following article: https://nextlevelchess.blog/most-effective-chess-training/
Hope these help.
Regards Andrea.
Hi Kevin, I found the following resources useful, when trying to respond to such question:
1) The free e.book you can download towards the bottom of the page here: https://nextlevelchess.blog/books/
2) The following article: https://nextlevelchess.blog/most-effective-chess-training/
Hope these help.
Regards Andrea.
Hey Andrea, thanks for that. Much appreciated. I'll have a look.
I hope all is well with you.
I've heard 50/50 is good, I was wondering what others find useful. I always do game analysis, so there is some learning there. I do puzzles on here and on Chesssable.
Thanks in advance.