Giving the game away on purpose is your opinion, not a fact
The fact that it happens to GMs occasionally does not prove your opinion is a fact
Rubinstein & Nimzovitch both overlooked a mate-in-2 in one of their games (vs each other) do you think they were both doing so on purpose?
GMs have much more subtle ways of cheating available, such as memorizing a plausible looking draw & then playing it out OTB
Why do Grandmasters make such blunderous moves, on purpose, when playing against other Grandmasters?
ie; there will be a piece hanging, and instead of taking it, and winning or equalizing, they try to make some `deep` move. Next thing you know they are losing. These are very obvious moves, even to me, a low level player, because I will spot these while playing through games, and then turn on Fritz or Rybka to blunder check, and sure enough, blunder!
Did you see the endgame between Carlson and Kramnik recently, where Kramnik moved his King and gave up the center. It took me less than 5 seconds to know the correct move, and I am only rated 1350 here. I felt like Kramnik basically gave the game away on purpose for whatever reason.
What do you guys think about these situations.
Have you noticed this?