Grandmaster in 100 days challenge

Sort:
kindaspongey
GM_in_100_days wrote (~18 hours ago):

… I have never played chess before in my life ...

 

kindaspongey
GM_in_100_days wrote (~13 hours ago):

... I litteraly started today without any knowledge of the game

 

kindaspongey
GM_in_100_days wrote (~13 hors ago):

I have played chess before with my dad when I was 8 years old. Maybe a couple of times in high school. ...

 

Sred
GM_in_100_days wrote:

But I genuinely don't get why everyone says I'm cheating? 

As long as you are rated 900, nobody really believes you are cheating. Good luck with your challenge. You will fail to reach the goal, but maybe you stick with chess.

drmrboss
PumpedAndSwollen wrote:

I have been playing chess for 9 days so far and am already over 2000.  2500 in 100 days should be more than doable.

There is proof! You just played 2 games and got 2000 rating!!

jiangyh1234567

You can theoretically get 2000 rating after ur first game on chess.com

jiangyh1234567

Cos of the rating system

Sred
jiangyh1234567 wrote:

You can theoretically get 2000 rating after ur first game on chess.com

Obviously, but the point is that such a rating is almost meaningless.

Uhohspaghettio1

That's a provisional rating surely - that's not the same as an actual rating. 

He's lucky if he breaks 1200. I remember being around the 1200s for years lol, that was when I had no idea how to play properly I just played any old way.  

If he does get good - and by this I mean 2200 blitz or something, he's a fraud who is operating a joke account like that kibidragon guy and it's all a scam where he is already really good. 

He won't get higher than that at absolute maximum because noone with that sort of ability would be here wasting their time doing such nonsense. 

MorphysMayhem

This whole post is a complete garbage troll thread.

 

Not only is that type of rapid improvement impossible, there is no way the OP could go out and earn the required three GM norms in that time period. So quite literally, this is impossible.

Sred
Morphys-Revenge wrote:

This whole post is a complete garbage troll thread.

 

Not only is that type of rapid improvement impossible, there is no way the OP could go out and earn the required three GM norms in that time period. So quite literally, this is impossible.

That doesn't make it a troll thread. It's totally possible that the OP just doesn't know the difficulty of the task. Maybe alcohol and some bet involved.

Tja_05

drmrboss wrote:

PumpedAndSwollen wrote:

I have been playing chess for 9 days so far and am already over 2000.  2500 in 100 days should be more than doable.

Why though

Queentimes3

Good luck with your challenge, it will be interesting to see where you are in 100 days. My expectation is that you will be demolished by the competition.

kindaspongey

June 25, 2020

TheGreatAttorney

GM_in_100_days wrote:

Hello everyone

I have never played chess before in my life and I'm going to try to become a grandmaster in chess in only 100 days. A friend of mine challenged me to do this since I'm an addictive learner. Wish me luck and support me on twitch.tv/3picemuboy grin.png

Kind Regards

Jordi

Perhaps challenge yourself to win against a GM in 100 days instead. That seems more realistic.

Uhohspaghettio1

Only in the same sense that challenging himself to play in the Welsh Premier League in 100 days is more realistic than challenging himself to playing in the English Premier League. 

READER10

good luck I want to become a grandmaster to but it will take years

READER10

what

Totally_Winsome

It sounds like you have underestimated chess and overestimated your own abilities. Next you will expect to become a surgeon in 100 days, or a concert pianist in 100 days.  So you have no respect for the accomplishments of others, and think you can achieve the same in a mere fraction of the time.  They call what your attitude displays The Dunning-Kruger Effect.  In the field of psychology, The Dunning-Kruger Effect  is a cognitive bias in which people with low ability at a task overestimate their ability. It is related to the cognitive bias of illusory superiority and comes from the inability of people to recognize their lack of ability. The Dunning-Kruger Effect refers to a moment when someone is too ignorant to know how ignorant they are. This effect is not uncommon in young children, who think they've learned all the math there is when they've learned to count to 100, or to add single digit numbers.  Most people outgrow this effect.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Pulpofeira

I call that the Being a Brother-in-Law Effect.