The name of the OP is so funny....LOL
GUESS THE ELO!
Sort:
18 days ago
0
#23
2000 1988. If you look at the mistakes in their game it becomes clear that most of these mistakes dont even look like mistakes. They look liks normal moves that anyone would play. Bishop h6 was only bad due to an inhumanly findable move 7 moves into the future. Knight e6 brilliant
but who the heck is going to see that? Most all of these moves where logical. The innacuracy at the beginning was in standard english attack theory
18 days ago
0
#24
Filigranova wrote:
Sicilian was already my favorite against e4 when I was 800. I learned it playing on the Netflix Queen’s Gambit game, which I really miss. They stopped updating it when iOS 18.1 came out.
Now it won’t even open, just crashes immediately.
That game taught a lot of openings. If it still worked, I would recommend it for all beginners.
Im at 800 and i can confirm i loved sicillian since 500 elo
18 days ago
0
#25
deodorogonta wrote:
1900-2000 maybe?
How the heck. Yes your right
17 days ago
0
#27
Magnesium_Calcium_500 wrote:
2000 1988. If you look at the mistakes in their game it becomes clear that most of these mistakes dont even look like mistakes. They look liks normal moves that anyone would play. Bishop h6 was only bad due to an inhumanly findable move 7 moves into the future. Knight e6 brilliant
but who the heck is going to see that? Most all of these moves werelogical. The innacuracy at the beginning was in standard english attack theory
No, the whole game was cringe. My partner is this range, and he would never make even half of those mistakes. And I play those openings and wouldn’t have.
KhoiJames wrote:
high beginner or low intermediate I think
That's not an elo.
futuregm7070 wrote:
Ummm, white is an intermediate and black is around 600
Intermediate is not an elo and intermediate is not around 600. I'd estimate 1800-1900.
Magnesium_Calcium_500 wrote:
deodorogonta wrote:
1900-2000 maybe?
How the heck. Yes your right
The lower-rated players that don't come anywhere close to category-1 assume anyone that is higher-rated is infallible to the extent of immortality. We're not. My games are full of mistakes and inaccuracies, even humorous blunders. Yet I'm 1800-1900 consistently.
17 days ago
0
#33
AutisticCath wrote:
The lower-rated players that don't come anywhere close to category-1 assume anyone that is higher-rated is infallible to the extent of immortality. We're not. My games are full of mistakes and inaccuracies, even humorous blunders. Yet I'm 1800-1900 consistently.
I definitely don’t think 1900-2000 players are infallible 😂
Of our last three games, I beat one twice, and neither one of us played this poorly.
Sicilian was already my favorite against e4 when I was 800. I learned it playing on the Netflix Queen’s Gambit game, which I really miss. They stopped updating it when iOS 18.1 came out.
Now it won’t even open, just crashes immediately.
That game taught a lot of openings. If it still worked, I would recommend it for all beginners.