Hard Work Alone Can Never Make You a Master

Sort:
in_prasad
HolyFlame777 wrote:

thank u prasad that guy brings down the whole level of the community, implying he had sex with other OP's mother, does he know what could happen to him in real life talking like that?

Why are you waiting for real life ? He insulted you on public forum in front of all. Don't you think he should face serious consequences. It has become habit on internet.

RonaldJosephCote

                What did you have in mind in_prasad??

in_prasad
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

                What did you have in mind in_prasad??

Who are you to ask me this question ????

RonaldJosephCote

                 OK, I'll sat it again. What did you have in mind??

in_prasad
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

                 OK, I'll sat it again. What did you have in mind??

Ok You are elder to me so in respect I am saying ---> I meant admin to delete Chess_gg's comment on other poster's mother. Which I think is very cheap. GOT IT UNCLE ?

RonaldJosephCote

                    Oh, you sounded like something else;  "why are you waiting for real life? Don't you think he should face serious consequences?"  You should say what you mean. BTW; there is a YO,MAMA jokes thread here. I'm sure gg just got confused, and forgot which thread he was in.  Also, if anyone can't take a few insults now and then, they have no business in these forums. Should I report the OP for what he said about me in post 185??  I'm not as childish as you and him. 1st he's a journalist, and now he's a psyco-anolist.

SmyslovFan
in_prasad wrote:

I didn't mean hardwork alone. What I meant was right kind of hardwork that includes everything time management/money management etc... To manage multiple things you need to be smart. Acting right on right time makes lot of difference.

...

This claim means that a person who has spent thousands of hours studying chess, but has not reached master level is not smart. 

You have successfully called tens of thousands of competitive chess players over the years "not smart" because they clearly couldn't work out the "right" way to use their time to become masters. This group, as I mentioned before, includes doctors, lawyers, MBAs, Ph.Ds, engineers, and so on. 

The fact that so many of these people have never broken even 2000 shows that they must not only be "not smart", they must be less than "not smart". You've effectively called them idiots.

in_prasad
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

                    Oh, you sounded like something else;  "why are you waiting for real life? Don't you think he should face serious consequences?"  You should say what you mean. BTW; there is a YO,MAMA jokes thread here. I'm sure gg just got confused, and forgot which thread he was in.

Are you sure gg just got confused. Ohh then it's serious issue. He should stop debating lol. Uncle you had your young life and when you could not achieve Master status then you are coming on internet forum and discouraging young people. Why don't you just accept you did not work hard and smartly.

RonaldJosephCote

                   SEE!  Smyslov caught you again.  SAY WHAT YOU MEAN.  Then there's no mis-communication, like yo,mama.

HolyFlame777

some people in this thread are looking for trouble, contention, retarded arguments, and evil.   Cote and gg for example.  Look with what dedication cote defends whatever waste matter comes out of gg's posts.

in_prasad
SmyslovFan wrote:
in_prasad wrote:

I didn't mean hardwork alone. What I meant was right kind of hardwork that includes everything time management/money management etc... To manage multiple things you need to be smart. Acting right on right time makes lot of difference.

...

This claim means that a person who has spent thousands of hours studying chess, but has not reached master level is not smart. 

You have successfully called tens of thousands of competitive chess players over the years "not smart" because they clearly couldn't work out the "right" way to use their time to become masters. This group, as I mentioned before, includes doctors, lawyers, MBAs, Ph.Ds, engineers, and so on. 

The fact that so many of these people have never broken even 2000 shows that they must not only be "not smart", they must be less than "not smart". You've effectively called them idiots.

There is something called average and laziness in between IDIOT AND SMART. Hope that helps you understand.

HolyFlame777

too many people looking for problems here

RonaldJosephCote

                      Who's debating??  I said, a 70 yr old gentleman got confused. It happens. The rest of your explanation in post 198 is just hilarious.

in_prasad
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

                   SEE!  Smyslov caught you again.  SAY WHAT YOU MEAN.  Then there's no mis-communication, like yo,mama.

Listen old man, In India we are taught to respect elders but that doesn't mean if elder is acting oversmart then we should tolerate that. Just live your rest of the life happily and stop discouraging younger from being hard worker cause you could not achive that.

in_prasad
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

                      Who's debating??  I said, a 70 yr old gentleman got confused. It happens. The rest of your explanation in post 198 is just hilarious.

Then this gentleman should stop debating. Cause it's clear his age showing signs of confusion. It may create more confusion LOL.

RonaldJosephCote

                   OK, I'm defending gg because he's 70 yrs old, and a United States Veteran.  Now, do you young idiots have something to say about THAT??  Let me use your own words. Some people who start 10 treads are looking for retarded arguments.

in_prasad
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

                   OK, I'm defending gg because he's 70 yrs old, and a United States Veteran.  Now, do you young idiots have something to say about THAT??  Let me use your own words. Some people who start 10 treads are looking for retarded arguments.

Are you sure you are calling me idiot ?? Don't back off later by saying I got confused LOL.

Relax SIR, you were soldier right ?? I have immense respect for soldiers. I am serious about this.

But I would request you not to get involve in chess game debate as it's clear you don't understand it. And by the way how it should bother you if someone is startinng 10 threads ??? Why it is dancing so much on your mind ?? Let them create 1000 threads. You have issues go to admin and get it remove.

in_prasad
chess_gg wrote:

Well, prasad...I doubt that you ever had a mama.

All this mama talk, I think both you and flame boy have a sicko oedipus complex and should be expelled for being such, as well as freeloaders. 

Your dear friend has already said you are confused person so I am stopping answering you after this last reply to you LOL. B happy.

SmyslovFan

In_prasad, your highest real-time (non-correspondence) rating here is under 1650. I'm guessing that by your own standard, you must be lazy and below average in intelligence. 

My condolences to you. 

RonaldJosephCote

                   In the words of John Malcavitch;  OLD MAN MY ASS!    post 204