What creates a successful attack?
Creating a weakness/weaknesses, space, and piece activity.
Let’s take a look at when it makes sense to castle opposite sides and when it doesn't.
You should castle on the opposite side when at least one of the following factors is true:
You should not castle on the opposite sides when at least one of the following factors in true:
Note: These are general rules, not laws, meaning that there are always exceptions to them. When you’re making a decision what side to castle you should always take your time and evaluate all “pros” and “cons” and base your decision upon your own analysis. This is a very important decision. It pretty much dictates which way the game will continue. Take your time and think twice.
The problem is that this kind of pawn storm happens even when we both castle kingside too. It's not as if I can avoid the pawn storm by castling same side. Here is an example:
Middlegame Planning:
Compare, space, material, and weakness(es)
Play where you have the advantage.
White has the material, and space advantage on the kingside. So this lets you know this is the part of the board white wants to play on. Black doesn't really have any type of tangible advantage anywhere, to take advantage of, so reduce whites advantage on the kingside.
This is a recurring theme that keeps happening to me over and over again:
> I have black pieces
> I castle kingside
> White pawn storms my kingside
> I panic and blunder because I don't know how to handle the pawn storm
> I look up an engine analysis and I have no idea why each move is right or wrong
> I repeat the same mistakes over and over again, because I haven't actually learnt what to do instead
Like I can show you several positions where it's happened. Here is an example, which came at move 13 after the Sicilian Defence Najdorf variation was played:
How do you approach these situations in general? What should my general thought process be? Is there a "rule of thumb" for knowing what to do when you're facing a pawn storm like this?