Totally agree with this. I would recommend that you edit the post to edit out your age. The internet can be a nasty place, and people who act nice can have bad intentions.
That said, I'll point something out in response to Deadmanparty: FIDE standards are MUCH higher than "average random person" standards of playing chess, but online seems to be somewhere in between. For example, a 1200 is a beginner by FIDE standards, but would crush pretty much all their friends and family. However, the same person is considered intermediate online.
If you want to be really serious, then yeah, otb tournaments are a desirable thing to aim to focus on, in the long-term. That said, despite 1000 being considered a new beginner otb, at 1000 I think you already should be easily crushing most if not all people you know who don't play chess much. You can also consider the "in-between" standard of online, which is higher than "random normal person" and lower than "FIDE players". I think that by chess.com standards, you would be an "upper beginner"; I've heard Gotham refer to 1100s as "intermediate" as well.
As has been mentioned before, though, you should focus on enjoying what you play and improving (if that's what you want) and not think solely about results and comparing to other people. You can always find people progressing faster than you. You can always find people progressing slower than you. It's not a race, and I'd say be content with where you at as long as you are putting in the efforts that you require of yourself given your goals.
Yeah great summary ice_cream_cake.
According to my age, I should be well into the 2000's or even higher but sadly, I am not!