Hikaru Nakumaru is a stupid idiot

Well I have your attention hikaru is an awesome guy:)

░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ 
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▀▄ 
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░█ 
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░█ 
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░█ 
...█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒█ 
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▄▒█ 
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░░█ 
░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█ 
░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█ 
░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█ 
░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█ 
░░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀ 

agree with title

Why?

agree with title

People shouldnt be upset with Nakamura , but with the organizers who changed the rules at the last minute . I am surprised FIDE would allow such a thing myself. 

Ahh, so that's why. I just read the article on chess.com, after my previous comment. Now it all makes sense.

his face definitely looks that

is that his face

I was going to say it's a proven fact that he's far from an idiot given how he's a GM. 

Being good at chess is different than intelligence

Being good at weightlifting is different than strength. 

Naa, it would be "being a body builder is different than being healthy"

Which is true :p

Only the newest weakest players use intelligence to play. GMs (and 99% of the rest of us) use our skills and knowledge acquired through practice and study.

Do you mean ability to learn is not the part of intelligence?

Sure, I think of the ability to learn as part of intelligence and also part of chess improvement.

None of those three things (chess, ability to learn, and intelligence) are equivalent to another though.

Skills are a demonstration of intelligence.  There are different kinds of intelligence too.  Memory recall, pattern recognition, observation, calculation, and planning all require different kinds of intelligence.  Chess is a very scientific game, but the science isn't always an exact one.  Like anything else a chess position is best known through the breaking down of its smallest individual parts and how they relate to one another.

Some skills are learned by rote and have nothing to do with intelligence. I think chess skill is very similar to this, so I disagree with your first sentence.

The rest seems a bit off topic.

There are probably some people though who would have more trouble getting themselves to constantly acquire more knowledge, and use the knowledge they already have to discover new things. When the situation gets exponentially tougher every 100 rating points, it takes a lot to keep going. So I think that there is something to be said for the ability to keep learning, and chess tests this quite intensely.

What bad thing has Naka done?

The topic was probably started when, after the last round of a tournament Anand had won (on tiebreaks), FIDE decided after the fact, that instead of tiebreaks they were going to use an armageddon game, which Naka won. So then Naka got first place.

Why not use a few rapid or blitz games? Why not just follow the tournament rules? The players were playing their games with these tiebreaks in mind.

Anyway, Naka was totally fine. The organizers surprised everyone.

FIDE? bwahahah, they are wired to the moon and broken.