X

Sort:
RookSacrifice_OLD
kingofshedinjas wrote:
fantasychesspro wrote:

 Could you learn grammer

This

That fake pro criticizes grammar but can't spell, what fantasy, so don't listen to him.

eirghoih

LOL, and ChessNut that GM isn't that good. It's not like I couldn't have played the IM and the GM. You played them because  (no offense they weren't playing that good whihc means you weren't playing that good) they wern't doing good...

ChessNut6453v3
[COMMENT DELETED]
ChessNut6453v3
[COMMENT DELETED]
Former_mod_david
Firstplay wrote:

Really? They seem to look at the threads they deem to have anything that smells of 'a person pushing their political bias', if they're deemed 'anti-establishment'.  Meanwhile business resumes, other stuff that breaks rules seemingly ok.  It'd be good to hear from Staff on this issue to clarify.

The only rule this thread breaks is the "be kind and respectful" requirement. The moderators will act using that rule only if a thread has become particularly nasty: this thread, while childish, has not come anywhere near that level of unpleasantness and therefore the moderators will continue to stay out of it while observing how it progresses.

Firstplay

Can I suggest a sanction for the perpetrator rather than thread closure?