Finally have won more games than I have lost.
I will have to change that, that is all. Good day. :)
The two sentences are contradictory. If you have succeeded in reaching a plus score, why would you want to change it?
Finally have won more games than I have lost.
I will have to change that, that is all. Good day. :)
The two sentences are contradictory. If you have succeeded in reaching a plus score, why would you want to change it?
I think that's the point.
I prefer to play people who are better than me, rather than easy wins for me. It improves my game. How can a person get better when they play inferior opponents?
Then there is the nookie factor. :)
Even better is to play people who are better than you and win.
I prefer to play people who are better than me, rather than easy wins for me. It improves my game. How can a person get better when they play inferior opponents?
Then there is the nookie factor. :)
Not to worry. You still have a sizeable minus score in bullet, so you have that going for you.
| Highest: | 1804 (Nov 22, 2014) |
|---|---|
| Avg. Opp.: | 1700 |
| Best Win: | 1964 (philippegodon) |
| Today‘s Rank: | #15,493 of 440,057 (96.4%) |
| Timeouts: | 1% (last 90 days) |
| Time/Move: | 3 hr 15 min |
| Total Games: | 341 (158 W/ 156 L / 27 D) |
350-something games out of 5000? I wouldn't exactly call that "huge."
I prefer to play people who are better than me, rather than easy wins for me. It improves my game. How can a person get better when they play inferior opponents?
Then there is the nookie factor. :)
Not to worry. You still have a huge minus score in bullet, so you have that going for you.
Very true, I used to be good ( well decent) at bullet. But now I lose alot on time, cant think fast anymore. I blame the Swedish. Still love bullet though.
350-something games out of 5000? I wouldn't exactly call that "huge."
True enough. How about "sizeable"?
Swedish?
Finally have won more games than I have lost.
I will have to change that, that is all. Good day. :)