Houdini 6 is busted by aggressive Leela attack!!

Sort:
drmrboss
6. g4!! is a very aggressive attack!! 

nighteyes1234

So Houdini on 1000 or whatever cores plays 3...h6 as best move?

yeah...and Im 3500. SF sees g4/Rg1 depth 25. cccc is junk.

stacyminnesota

69. Qc6+. Ke5. 70. F4#.  

NGOSACHOMBA

fake ..... Houdini can't play like that whatever the case.. leela lost to Hermann on my pc..lc0 is hype people..

drmrboss
NGOSACHOMBA wrote:

fake ..... Houdini can't play like that whatever the case.. leela lost to Hermann on my pc..lc0 is hype people..

Leela is a high technology Neural Network. U need modern GPU and decent computer knowledge to use Leela properly.  U can ask help from leela discord if you want.  $200 1060 GTX GPU is minimum requirement for Leela.

 

drmrboss
nighteyes1234 wrote:

So Houdini on 1000 or whatever cores plays 3...h6 as best move?

yeah...and Im 3500. SF sees g4/Rg1 depth 25. cccc is junk.

Well, Houdini is still top 2 among 33 engines. Houdini lost only two games. (Lco and SF). 

 

 

Daniel1115

The hardware is obviously not good enough for Houdini to shine, someone pointed out 3.h6, which should make the hardware issue glaringly obvious.

drmrboss
Daniel1115 wrote:

The hardware is obviously not good enough for Houdini to shine, someone pointed out 3.h6, which should make the hardware issue glaringly obvious.

Houdini has 46 cores CPU, which is the top end hardware today! I agreed, h6 is not a strong move! I am pretty sure that Hoduni did not expect such 6.g4 attack .It is an unusually aggessive attack.

 

The strongest hardware that I have ever seen is 384 threads(192 cores CPU) . 

K_Brown

I wonder if Houdini was programmed to treat blitz different and that made a huge difference...

NGOSACHOMBA

i have used Houdini for a long time. and one thing I know is it cant play such move even on a whacky pc..and if leela can perform well on that hardware then it must More to Houdini.infact Houdini is quite strong on shorter time controls