Yes he should continue to pursue his passion, so what if he is low rated? Are you saying the only people allowed to continue their hobbies are prodigies? The kid has a hobby, he likes chess, it's a healthy activity why shouldn't he keep playing? I don't understand why you're bringing up prodigies into the discussion
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/how-can-i-play-chess-again?page=1#comment-69226633
He's considering it as his career and his life. Not just a hobby. I think that makes a huge difference, no?
Yes and? He's 12, kids dream. I used to dream of being a pro athlete when I was a kid, obviously it never happened but I don't regret playing sports as a child. It gave me a hobby, it kept me in physical shape, I made a lot of friends etc. As I got older I realized my dreams of being a pro athlete were unrealistic and I moved on with life but I am glad I still played anyways. So why is chess any different?
Karjakhin was a GM at 12. In this area "kids" are professionals.
Like how can people here in good faith defend the father? seriously, not only was the punishment and the crime absurd, but the "rule" itself is also completely vague. "son ,get off chess" in the context of a single game in a place does not translate to "never play chess again". Idk in what universe that makes any sense. Ok, maybe "you are grounded for a week" implies chess specifically and the OP didnt mention this, but the punishment for the crime, is so hilariously absurd, i cant take it seriously even then.
You can comply to these ridiculous rule if you think it will best serve your purpose. Or you can go behind their backs. Just weigh the pros and cons . If you are as serious about chess as you claim to be, you know what you need to do.
This is merely one side of the story. A 12 year old's. One who thinks his life and career is chess.
In his eyes his parents and perhaps even life may be unreasonable. While we hear what he says, we also have to temper it with the necessary context.