bellido22 wrote:
It was a bad move. It loses your queen. To the rook.
There really was nothing "interesting" about it.
But you were already losing.
The computer reviewer should be programmed to say things a little more directly.
How can the mod tell that this is an interesting move?
Sort:
my opponent loses the queen, I put it because it amused me when reviewing the game that he did not give it as a serious error but as an excellent one.
Aug 8, 2022
0
#4
bellido22 wrote:
my opponent loses the queen, I put it because it amused me when reviewing the game that he did not give it as a serious error but as an excellent one.
There is an explanation.
Under the system chess.com is using to classify moves, it looks at your chances of winning or losing before and after the move. You were already losing desisively. Losing your queen only worsened your already bad chances by a little bit...so it gets called "Excellent."
justbefair escribió:
bellido22 wrote:
my opponent loses the queen, I put it because it amused me when reviewing the game that he did not give it as a serious error but as an excellent one.
There is an explanation.
Under the system chess.com is using to classify moves, it looks at your chances of winning or losing before and after the move. You were already losing desisively. Losing your queen only worsened your already bad chances by a little bit...so it gets called "Excellent."
It's just that you don't know how to read, that's not my move, it's my rival's.
How can the mod tell that this is an interesting move?
https://im.ge/i/FWDjA9