how come this guy is 2000 blitz but 1200 tactics

how can someone play good at blitz but be much worse in tactics?

https://www.chess.com/members/view/ASADKAMALADEE

Lactobacilo wrote:

how can someone play good at blitz but be much worse in tactics?

https://www.chess.com/members/view/xxx

It's obvious, isn't it?

Master pills. He started taking them back in February when his rating was 700.

/ You are not supposed to make accusations in the forum. Erase the link and write to support.

Maybe he lets a friend or sibling play through tactics on his phone? But it is very unusual for a person's best rating to be in blitz. Usually the slower the time controls, the higher their rating is (with the obvious exception of having only played a handful of games or having a high timeout rate).

Because we're an emotional bunch.

Because we are all human being. We care for other.your case may be different. but that's not my problem

Not to mention 800 in bullet. I smell a rotten fish.

I play in my account myself only. bullet is my weakest link. but I cannot think bad about other. so I still care about bullet rating. It proves I am a human being