Like the way he's hyper analysing the games, he can easily say that stockfish is trash by looking at how torch handled it in some games
How do I get better at blitz?
Sort:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
Sep 6, 2023
0
#124
EviLOverMind wrote:
The funny thing is that the guy trying to find inaccurate moves in my games around move 17 with the help of an engine while himself he doesn't even understand what are the very main ideas of the Catalan.
QC2 is a common line and you played the books moves, great job!
You ever heard of the Sicilian? You played the Reversed Grand Prix, any experienced Sicilian player understands the move d5, or in Reversed colors = d4.
Go ahead and praise yourself but this is not anything impressive. You miss the obvious nuances, hence your your Catalan and Engish is junk.
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
oh ye, and at move 11, they should've probably played dxe4 and played against the IQP
Sep 6, 2023
0
#126
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
Sep 6, 2023
0
#128
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?
No you aren't, and neither was he. What he was trying to imply was that he was infinitely better than you.
And what he meant is this:
He is infinitely times better than you which means your strength is 0. He is also admitting he makes blunders and all, but he is still better than 0
Sep 6, 2023
0
#130
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?
No you aren't, and neither was he. What he was trying to imply was that he was infinitely better than you.
And what he meant is this:
He is infinitely times better than you which means your strength is 0. He is also admitting he makes blunders and all, but he is still better than 0
Therefore he is not perfect!
I can get past the name calling by him, but leave God out of it.
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?
No you aren't, and neither was he. What he was trying to imply was that he was infinitely better than you.
And what he meant is this:
He is infinitely times better than you which means your strength is 0. He is also admitting he makes blunders and all, but he is still better than 0
Therefore he is not perfect!
I can get past the name calling by him, but leave God out of it.
Ok, but anyways. How can you say you are a good catalan player or say that his catalan is "junk" when you cannot even do basic positional moves?
Sep 6, 2023
0
#132
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?
No you aren't, and neither was he. What he was trying to imply was that he was infinitely better than you.
And what he meant is this:
He is infinitely times better than you which means your strength is 0. He is also admitting he makes blunders and all, but he is still better than 0
Therefore he is not perfect!
I can get past the name calling by him, but leave God out of it.
Ok, but anyways. How can you say you are a good catalan player or say that his catalan is "junk" when you cannot even do basic positional moves?
Both of our Catalans are junk but I’ve never seen so many inaccuracies and obvious blunders from a 2200.
May be his poop doesn’t stink?
I occasionally train with the 2000+ FIDE players and an NM, it’s what I compare him to as a baseline. Which is why I am not impressed and he continues to talk as a Catalan expert, yeah right.
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?
No you aren't, and neither was he. What he was trying to imply was that he was infinitely better than you.
And what he meant is this:
He is infinitely times better than you which means your strength is 0. He is also admitting he makes blunders and all, but he is still better than 0
Therefore he is not perfect!
I can get past the name calling by him, but leave God out of it.
Ok, but anyways. How can you say you are a good catalan player or say that his catalan is "junk" when you cannot even do basic positional moves?
Both of our Catalans are junk but I’ve never seen so many inaccuracies and obvious blunders from a 2200.
May be his poop doesn’t stink?
I occasionally train with the 2000+ FIDE players and an NM, it’s what I compare him too.
I've played NMs before, one of them lost a game in 12 moves losing a Rook
Sep 6, 2023
0
#134
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?
No you aren't, and neither was he. What he was trying to imply was that he was infinitely better than you.
And what he meant is this:
He is infinitely times better than you which means your strength is 0. He is also admitting he makes blunders and all, but he is still better than 0
Therefore he is not perfect!
I can get past the name calling by him, but leave God out of it.
Ok, but anyways. How can you say you are a good catalan player or say that his catalan is "junk" when you cannot even do basic positional moves?
Both of our Catalans are junk but I’ve never seen so many inaccuracies and obvious blunders from a 2200.
May be his poop doesn’t stink?
I occasionally train with the 2000+ FIDE players and an NM, it’s what I compare him too.
I've played NMs before, one of them lost a game in 12 moves losing a Rook
The games I sampled were junk. All I did was count up the number of inaccuracies, misses and blunders. That’s more in line with 1500 FIDE if I was guessing the ELO.
No engine needed.
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?
No you aren't, and neither was he. What he was trying to imply was that he was infinitely better than you.
And what he meant is this:
He is infinitely times better than you which means your strength is 0. He is also admitting he makes blunders and all, but he is still better than 0
Therefore he is not perfect!
I can get past the name calling by him, but leave God out of it.
Ok, but anyways. How can you say you are a good catalan player or say that his catalan is "junk" when you cannot even do basic positional moves?
Both of our Catalans are junk but I’ve never seen so many inaccuracies and obvious blunders from a 2200.
May be his poop doesn’t stink?
I occasionally train with the 2000+ FIDE players and an NM, it’s what I compare him too.
I've played NMs before, one of them lost a game in 12 moves losing a Rook
The games I sampled were junk. All I did was count up the number of inaccuracies, misses and blunders. That’s more in line with 1500 FIDE if I was guessing the ELO.
No engine needed.
What's your fide rating?
Sep 6, 2023
0
#136
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.
You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either
I won the club tournament is all I remembered!
As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.
You didn't play good positional chess.
I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?
No you aren't, and neither was he. What he was trying to imply was that he was infinitely better than you.
And what he meant is this:
He is infinitely times better than you which means your strength is 0. He is also admitting he makes blunders and all, but he is still better than 0
Therefore he is not perfect!
I can get past the name calling by him, but leave God out of it.
Ok, but anyways. How can you say you are a good catalan player or say that his catalan is "junk" when you cannot even do basic positional moves?
Both of our Catalans are junk but I’ve never seen so many inaccuracies and obvious blunders from a 2200.
May be his poop doesn’t stink?
I occasionally train with the 2000+ FIDE players and an NM, it’s what I compare him too.
I've played NMs before, one of them lost a game in 12 moves losing a Rook
The games I sampled were junk. All I did was count up the number of inaccuracies, misses and blunders. That’s more in line with 1500 FIDE if I was guessing the ELO.
No engine needed.
What's your fide rating?
I’m not registered with FIDE.
Sep 6, 2023
0
#137
EviLOverMind wrote:
The funny thing is that the guy trying to find inaccurate moves in my games around move 17 with the help of an engine while himself he doesn't even understand what are the very main ideas of the Catalan.
It’s because you are weak in the middle game, basic tactics, blunders and end games relative to your peers. I’m starting to think you are over rated, explains why you think highly of yourself over others.
Chuck639 wrote:
EviLOverMind wrote:
The funny thing is that the guy trying to find inaccurate moves in my games around move 17 with the help of an engine while himself he doesn't even understand what are the very main ideas of the Catalan.
It’s because you are weak in the middle game, basic tactics and end games relative to your peers. I’m starting to think you are over rated, explains why you think highly of yourself over others.
You blunder a lot.
hypocrite. You are also weak in the middlegame
Sep 6, 2023
0
#140
Anirudh_23 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
EviLOverMind wrote:
The funny thing is that the guy trying to find inaccurate moves in my games around move 17 with the help of an engine while himself he doesn't even understand what are the very main ideas of the Catalan.
It’s because you are weak in the middle game, basic tactics and end games relative to your peers. I’m starting to think you are over rated, explains why you think highly of yourself over others.
You blunder a lot.
hypocrite. You are also weak in the middlegame
I am not the one comparing myself to God and name calling others, am I?
Normally I would stay in my lane, but dude plays the same white repertoire as me. I have no problem discussing about the Catalan or English.
Anyways, openings are not the issues. It’s blunders.
2200 is a joke on this site, anybody can get there by chomping on hanging pieces
Finally, somebody with obvious common sense!
The problem is that you're 5 levels below that.
And because you have nothing to say you use your kindergarten argumentation.
Cmon show me what I don't understand in Catalan and you do! Cmon! DO IT!
On second thought, one time.
Here you should castle; consider king safety.
Next time, play an earlier d4 into a Reversed Grand Prix.
Most of your games are filled with these inaccuracies and blunders.
Now get off my nutsack…..
https://www.chess.com/game/live/85512149483?username=evilovermind
Wow you found a blunder in a blitz game! So impressive! This all you can do. Find blunder in my fast games with the help of an engine. But you cannot say anything about my chess understanding AT ALL because your own chess understanding is close to ZERO.
ONCE AGAIN! Can you show me my poor understanding of Catalan or not?
I’ve done a sampling and it’s more than satisfactory that we both can conclude your Catalan and English is junk.
Not sure why that is confusing?
Don't show blunders he did, show positional flaws he did. After all, the catalan is a VERY positional opening
Transposition to the closed Catalan, mostly Qc2 book moves/line but why not e4?
https://www.chess.com/game/live/85511533103?username=evilovermind
Because it quite complicated middlegame and in a 3 min blitz game you don't want to create weaknesses (the d4 pawn) for no reason. You have no time to calculate thus you want to play solid. Btw in this particular game I played first 16 moves of the opening on a very top level. That move 17 is a very-very tiny inacuracy from the engine point of view. But from the human point of view it's abosolutely fine. Especially for a 3 min blitz game.
Once again, your beginnerish brain found an tiny inacurate move from the engine point of view in the deep middlegame. That is all what you are able to do.
When you'll show me my weak Catalan? I'm still waiting. Stop finding my mistakes/blunders in my middlegames and endgames!
Let him do that. He can check all those if he wants to but its not proving he is better than you.