How do I get better at blitz?

Checked your draw against an 1800. That guy didn't seem to care at all tbh.

You didn't blunder, but you didn't play good positional chess either

QC2 is a common line and you played the books moves, great job!

You ever heard of the Sicilian? You played the Reversed Grand Prix, any experienced Sicilian player understands the move d5, or in Reversed colors = d4.

Go ahead and praise yourself but this is not anything impressive. You miss the obvious nuances, hence your your Catalan and Engish is junk.

oh ye, and at move 11, they should've probably played dxe4 and played against the IQP

I won the club tournament is all I remembered!

As I mentioned previously, I’m not looking for perfection.

You didn't play good positional chess.

I’m not the one claiming to be equal with God, am I?

No you aren't, and neither was he. What he was trying to imply was that he was infinitely better than you.

And what he meant is this:
He is infinitely times better than you which means your strength is 0. He is also admitting he makes blunders and all, but he is still better than 0

Therefore he is not perfect!

I can get past the name calling by him, but leave God out of it.

Ok, but anyways. How can you say you are a good catalan player or say that his catalan is "junk" when you cannot even do basic positional moves?

Both of our Catalans are junk but I’ve never seen so many inaccuracies and obvious blunders from a 2200.

May be his poop doesn’t stink?

I occasionally train with the 2000+ FIDE players and an NM, it’s what I compare him to as a baseline. Which is why I am not impressed and he continues to talk as a Catalan expert, yeah right.

I've played NMs before, one of them lost a game in 12 moves losing a Rook

The games I sampled were junk. All I did was count up the number of inaccuracies, misses and blunders. That’s more in line with 1500 FIDE if I was guessing the ELO.

No engine needed.

What's your fide rating?

I’m not registered with FIDE.

It’s because you are weak in the middle game, basic tactics, blunders and end games relative to your peers. I’m starting to think you are over rated, explains why you think highly of yourself over others.

hypocrite. You are also weak in the middlegame

I would suggest we stop arguing and move on with life.

I am not the one comparing myself to God and name calling others, am I?

Normally I would stay in my lane, but dude plays the same white repertoire as me. I have no problem discussing about the Catalan or English.

Anyways, openings are not the issues. It’s blunders.

Why are you nitpicking on blunders. Like if you don't make blunders, are you a literal genius or god? That doesn't make sense. I'm sure Magnus Carlsen has made bad blunders before. I don't see anybody saying "Magnus Carlsen is bad because he is blundering". Does that seriously make any sense?

Exactly my point (even stockfish makes mistakes otherwise how would other engines be able to beat it?)