Etymologist35 wrote:
Also, at 2000+ you should not be asking this question....something smells awfully fishy..
I am legit if u are accusing me of cheating....
How does one analyze their games?
Sort:
Feb 2, 2026
0
#23
ChanMan4 wrote:
Etymologist35 wrote:
Also, at 2000+ you should not be asking this question....something smells awfully fishy..
I am legit if u are accusing me of cheating....
Absolutely not. Just a curious post. I should not have said "should not" and I could have phrased my post better.
Unless we consider sandbagging cheating and I do not. I simply do not see how anyone can get to 2000+ Rapid without being well studied but that's also presumptuous. Good day and good luck in all your games.
Feb 2, 2026
0
#24
Etymologist35 wrote:
ChanMan4 wrote:
Etymologist35 wrote:
Also, at 2000+ you should not be asking this question....something smells awfully fishy..
I am legit if u are accusing me of cheating....
Absolutely not. Just a curious post. I should not have said "should not" and I could have phrased my post better.
Unless we consider sandbagging cheating and I do not. I simply do not see how anyone can get to 2000+ Rapid without being well studied but that's also presumptuous. Good day and good luck in all your games.
ok my bad my bad. idk how i got to 2100. i do have a chess coach, so yea i guess i study a bit but for some reason i got around to understanding how to learn from game analysis
Feb 2, 2026
0
#25
If you don't agree with analysis why a move should be bad then just play the defense or attack you had in mind and see how the computer crushes or extraordinarily defends against those if you want to know how to learn with a computer. Some coaches recommend learning without computer by doing all analysis by your own. Try both and see which one helps you improve the most trying each method one month each.
I do, trust me.