Not to be a downer -- but I am a firm believer that with much of chess brilliance, you are either born with it or your not.
And if I sound critical -- I am certainly in the "not" column! (I was not born with any significan chess skills).
My personal guess (and from my own experience and observing those of others) is that even the most rigorous and demanding of training routines will only improve your ranking a couple hundred points.
Thus -- even with the most devout of studying -- there is little chance a novice will ever become a Grandmaster (or anything close to it).
The only exception I would make regards age. Obviously, if you are extremely young it is possible to make great leaps and strides in rankings -- but I mean very young (I would say under 12). If you haven't shown chess brillance by puberty, you probably never will.
Again, I am not trying to be a jerk, but I think that is just the way it is. (With chess and so many other things in life -- intelligence, sports ability, etc.).
Obviously, of course, everyone is different. There's plenty of people who have proved everything I said above wrong!
I certainly wish you the best -- if anything it sounds like a fun way to spend your free time (more fun than work anyways!).
How far could I get with this chess training schedule? In 6 years, what do you think my progress will be?
Here is the schedule, I am sure many people of the forum has seen it before. They are all mostly an hour or two hours of practice.
Mon - Endgame. - Lecture Video (Limited), Chess Book, Endgame Puzzles.
Tues - Middlegame. - Lecture Video (Limited), YouTube Video on Magnus Carlsen's Game (Analysis), Chess Book.
Wed - Openings. - Lecture Video (Limited), Puzzles, Chess Book.
Thurs - Tactics (Pure Tactics), Chess Book to Solve Tactics.
Fri - Strategy, Chess Book.
The story: I have no websites that has guess the move for free and I don't want to download so.. yeah. All of my lectures are limited, soon I will have to search random videos on YouTube on certain positions and etc., my practice is based primarily on lecture videos in which will run out in about 10 weeks. From then I will study endgame positions on YouTube. I have lecture videos on game analysis so I will use that. And for middlegame I am sure there are 1000 of games Magnus has played on YouTube for me and the youtuber to analysis.
However I feel like this is unstable. Am I really doing it right? Anyways sticking to the topic, for openings I will not build an opening repertoire until I am finished my book, I already have opening repertoire from game experiences. I am not rich for all those go to otb tournaments people. Thanks.