How good are you based on your skill and rating.

Sort:
Thorin723

i talked to you once

QueensGambitDude123

I also own a club. It's call "Chess Tourists"

Thorin723

yeah i know i went to your profile and saw it it said

dont click

CriticalPhantom

I legit just won on blitz because someone disconnected

QueensGambitDude123

You left 4pc?

Thorin723

yeah

 

Thorin723

wait you want to be freinds with me

CriticalPhantom

eric0022
Stil1 wrote:
FoolMate2222 wrote:

...

1700-1999 Above Average

2000 Your skill are most likely compared to a grandmaster. 

I like how a 1999 player would be "Above Average", yet a player one point higher (2000) would immediately jump to "most likely compared to a grandmaster".

Lol

 

...I can't believe you thought of this point...

eric0022
Feederf wrote:

What marks the difference between the categories?

For instance, when does one stop being a beginner and start being intermediate?

 

To be fair, there should be an overlap in the regions for the rating.

 

For example

 

0 - 400 novice

300 - 700 beginner

etc

Ziryab

Under 1200 are beginners.

Infectiousplug

WOW! @Ziryab. I didn't know that, OH MY GOD!!!! You are einstien.

Ziryab
HowDareYouChallenge wrote:

WOW! @Ziryab. I didn't know that, OH MY GOD!!!! You are einstien.

 

Correction. I’m not a novice. This thread is ridiculous. I should have left it alone.

Ilampozhil25

average intermediate and above 99% beginner?

im a beginner and 999 is totally the same as 1000

llama47
Feederf wrote:

What marks the difference between the categories?

For instance, when does one stop being a beginner and start being intermediate?

It depends on your goals, how hard you're working, that sort of thing.

A "club player," like me, might say you're not intermediate until you're ~1600 OTB... but that's because the average OTB tournament player I'm accustom to is that good.

People who work a lot harder than that, and go to stronger tournaments, might not think much of a person until they at least have a title (for example).

It was pretty humbling to hear Svidler, Jan, and Firouzja agree that the GM title is "a good goal for amateurs" but players like Svidler and Firouzja never had such "low" goals as that.

-

But most people online are much less serious about their game than every standard I've mentioned so far. A new player who enjoys playing a few games a month and maybe watching a few streamers (no other study or learning) could understandably call a 1000  online rating intermediate.

FoolMate2222
Lurking_Garbage wrote:

Interesting topic coming from this account.

What's with my account?

FoolMate2222
Ziryab wrote:
HowDareYouChallenge wrote:

WOW! @Ziryab. I didn't know that, OH MY GOD!!!! You are einstien.

 

Correction. I’m not a novice. This thread is ridiculous. I should have left it alone.

My tread is very accurate.

FoolMate2222
CriticalPhantom wrote:

 

Cool toys

FoolMate2222
eric0022 wrote:
Stil1 wrote:
FoolMate2222 wrote:

...

1700-1999 Above Average

2000 Your skill are most likely compared to a grandmaster. 

I like how a 1999 player would be "Above Average", yet a player one point higher (2000) would immediately jump to "most likely compared to a grandmaster".

Lol

 

...I can't believe you thought of this point...

Me too

FoolMate2222
PeterGriffinTM wrote:

This is so epic. Thank you for your vast knowledge on the art of Chessing.

You are welcome happy.png