How good are you based on your skill and rating.

yeah

i talked to you once

I also own a club. It's call "Chess Tourists"

yeah i know i went to your profile and saw it it said

dont click

I legit just won on blitz because someone disconnected

You left 4pc?

yeah

wait you want to be freinds with me

...I can't believe you thought of this point...

To be fair, there should be an overlap in the regions for the rating.

For example

0 - 400 novice

300 - 700 beginner

etc

Under 1200 are beginners.

WOW! @Ziryab. I didn't know that, OH MY GOD!!!! You are einstien.

Correction. I’m not a novice. This thread is ridiculous. I should have left it alone.

average intermediate and above 99% beginner?

im a beginner and 999 is totally the same as 1000

It depends on your goals, how hard you're working, that sort of thing.

A "club player," like me, might say you're not intermediate until you're ~1600 OTB... but that's because the average OTB tournament player I'm accustom to is that good.

People who work a lot harder than that, and go to stronger tournaments, might not think much of a person until they at least have a title (for example).

It was pretty humbling to hear Svidler, Jan, and Firouzja agree that the GM title is "a good goal for amateurs" but players like Svidler and Firouzja never had such "low" goals as that.

-

But most people online are much less serious about their game than every standard I've mentioned so far. A new player who enjoys playing a few games a month and maybe watching a few streamers (no other study or learning) could understandably call a 1000  online rating intermediate.

What's with my account?

My tread is very accurate.

Cool toys

Me too