how good is my rating for 2 years of play?


Take into account the ratings of the players I've beat to get here. Thanks

Generally you're not wrong, but I've had to beat players 2000+ to get here
Additionally, it was not a brag... I was replying to another user who actually was bragging about reaching 1800 in a year, basically attempting to rain on OPs parade. This has already gotten way off topic

I'm not trying to bring him down, he asked what people though of his rating, I was telling him, should I lie and make him feel great?! Huh?!

I reached 2100 in 7 games on an alt account. When youve played 100 games I might say that's your actual rating

This burneraltacoount or whatever is being stupid, I never rained on anyone's parade. I GAVE HIM A TRUTHFULL THOUGHT ON HIS RATING AND HE ASKED FOR ONE! IS THERE ANYTHING WRONG HERE?!?

It's respectable for sure. I've been playing around a year and gone from 800 to 1700 but I invested a lot of time in that year.

Take into account the ratings of the players I've beat to get here. Thanks
Interesting.. Let’s start the procedure. -Kramnik

This dude told me in a message, Burneraltaccount or something, that he had played 25 years, and his USCF rating is 2035. He said he played only 1 year in comment #19. Let's take a look at his chess.com blitz rating and his amount of rapid games played lol. I told him about this and he called me bad and blocked me, so I can confirm he is trolling

This dude told me in a message, Burneraltaccount or something, that he had played 25 years, and his USCF rating is 2035. He said he played only 1 year in comment #19. Let's take a look at his chess.com blitz rating and his amount of rapid games played lol. I told him about this and he called me bad and blocked me, so I can confirm he is trolling
USCF and online vary differently. he potentially could have played for 25 years OTB, but only a year in chess.com, respectably. Generally, you cannot base skill on rating, but his past comment of "Generally you're not wrong, but I've had to beat players 2000+ to get here" seems accurate and a good argument, since you cant just beat 2000 plus players if your Elo isn't around that much. Not trying to meat ride him at all, or siding with him, just pointing stuff out.
Are you stuck in 1400?