Well it is not Elo 0 for sure may just use PuMaverick trick.
How good is the questionmaster bot??
Sort:
Dark_Viper_23 wrote:
ok I hadn't tried so I just assumed because of the 0 elo
questionmaster bot is noob lmao. i got a 2000 perfomance against him with an 1800 perfomance
I beat him by using PuMavericks trick.
MechaTornado wrote:
I beat him by using PuMavericks trick.
i checkmated him
Jun 28, 2023
0
#126
Question master you can beat him just go to custom select 1 min and you can beat him on time
Jun 28, 2023
0
#127
prgup28 wrote:
"The Questionmaster questions the only questions which the Questionmaster questions! Any questions?" One of my questions is "When will the Questionmaster get defeated by me?"
When you play bullet
I did, I WON!!!
You won using hints. No hints crushes you under 20moves. I drew the thing with no hints in french defence under 25moves. Only once and have come close 3times beating it but it's end game is way beyond my level. It's beatable if you close the centre and no open files.
Jun 29, 2023
0
#134
I tried it once and I lost against it, it was actually good. So I think it’s meant to trick you with the number 0
Doughnut15 wrote:
I tried it once and I lost against it, it was actually good. So I think it’s meant to trick you with the number 0
bro im ngl, its so noob. its rating is prob 1800
I tried beating it with the engine, but he still won so it is either:
(exhibit a) He is unstoppable and the only thing that can be him is Mittens or a titled player
or
(b) The engine is wrong.
I played against the Questionmaster and he certainly did not play like Stockfish. He beat me, but Stockfish is much better and I can tell. My theory is that he always plays just a bit better than you. He analyzes your play and chooses his moves accordingly.
Checkmate_0857 wrote:
I played against the Questionmaster and he certainly did not play like Stockfish. He beat me, but Stockfish is much better and I can tell. My theory is that he always plays just a bit better than you. He analyzes your play and chooses his moves accordingly.
you're sort of right. but the thing is, his playing style is inconsistent.
PlsHelpMeISuckAtChess wrote:
Checkmate_0857 wrote:
I played against the Questionmaster and he certainly did not play like Stockfish. He beat me, but Stockfish is much better and I can tell. My theory is that he always plays just a bit better than you. He analyzes your play and chooses his moves accordingly.
you're sort of right. but the thing is, his playing style is inconsistent.
What do you mean? How is his playing style inconsistent? And why would that matter?
Checkmate_0857 wrote:
PlsHelpMeISuckAtChess wrote:
Checkmate_0857 wrote:
I played against the Questionmaster and he certainly did not play like Stockfish. He beat me, but Stockfish is much better and I can tell. My theory is that he always plays just a bit better than you. He analyzes your play and chooses his moves accordingly.
you're sort of right. but the thing is, his playing style is inconsistent.
What do you mean? How is his playing style inconsistent? And why would that matter?
i played 3 games against him. the first 2 games, i lost coz he played like a goddamn engine with a whopping performance rating of 3200. the last game, i annihilated him, with him having a performance of 1800.
A