how is this brilliant... - Chess Forums

navinashok

Jun 4, 2024

0

#1

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/111304276457?tab=review&move=50

rf1. How in the world is this brilliant I just didn't know that my knight was hanging

I actually am so good at hanging pieces, like I predict a bad move that I might have played and think of another move but play the bad move instead like I'm genuinely retarded sometimes. This time I didn't take enough time to see that my ROOK WAS HANGING I'm Actually dumb.

also what happened to the game review feature where you retry and it makes a new accuracy?

Martin_Stahl

Jun 5, 2024

0

#2

navinashok wrote:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/111304276457?tab=review&move=50

rf1. How in the world is this brilliant I just didn't know that my knight was hanging

I actually am so good at hanging pieces, like I predict a bad move that I might have played and think of another move but play the bad move instead like I'm genuinely retarded sometimes. This time I didn't take enough time to see that my ROOK WAS HANGING I'm Actually dumb.

also what happened to the game review feature where you retry and it makes a new accuracy?

Intent doesn't matter for move classifications. If you play a move that is good or best that sacrifices material, it may qualify for the brilliant classification.

As for retries, the accuracy after retries wasn't added to the new version of Game Review

Gottfried94

Jun 5, 2024

0

#3

navinashok wrote:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/111304276457?tab=review&move=50

rf1. How in the world is this brilliant I just didn't know that my knight was hanging

I actually am so good at hanging pieces, like I predict a bad move that I might have played and think of another move but play the bad move instead like I'm genuinely retarded sometimes. This time I didn't take enough time to see that my ROOK WAS HANGING I'm Actually dumb.

also what happened to the game review feature where you retry and it makes a new accuracy?

The reason why it's brilliant is because the evaluation bar didn't drop when you left the knight hanging. It's not really for free you see as his knight is hanging as well

navinashok

Jun 6, 2024

0

#4

Martin_Stahl wrote:

navinashok wrote:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/111304276457?tab=review&move=50

rf1. How in the world is this brilliant I just didn't know that my knight was hanging

I actually am so good at hanging pieces, like I predict a bad move that I might have played and think of another move but play the bad move instead like I'm genuinely retarded sometimes. This time I didn't take enough time to see that my ROOK WAS HANGING I'm Actually dumb.

also what happened to the game review feature where you retry and it makes a new accuracy?

Intent doesn't matter for move classifications. If you play a move that is good or best that sacrifices material, it may qualify for the brilliant classification.

As for retries, the accuracy after retries wasn't added to the new version of Game Review

helpful, thanks!

navinashok

Jun 6, 2024

0

#5

Gottfried94 wrote:

navinashok wrote:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/111304276457?tab=review&move=50

rf1. How in the world is this brilliant I just didn't know that my knight was hanging

I actually am so good at hanging pieces, like I predict a bad move that I might have played and think of another move but play the bad move instead like I'm genuinely retarded sometimes. This time I didn't take enough time to see that my ROOK WAS HANGING I'm Actually dumb.

also what happened to the game review feature where you retry and it makes a new accuracy?

The reason why it's brilliant is because the evaluation bar didn't drop when you left the knight hanging. It's not really for free you see as his knight is hanging as well

true, but the trade-off is + 3 -3 so material is even but the analysis goes +3 even though it's just a material trade.