How long does it take to go to depth 50
Let us know. Haven't you ever just let it run?
Let us know. Haven't you ever just let it run?
No I'm to impatient
Let us know. Haven't you ever just let it run?
No I'm to impatient
27 minutes.
Now, am I telling the truth, or am I lying to you? I'll give you the answer next week...
I don't know much about engines, but wouldn't it take longer in the mid-game with more pieces and shorter in the end-game with only a few pieces. And, is the time exponential? If it takes 3 minutes for 30, wouldn't it take much, much longer to get to 50 than just doubling to 6 minutes even though 50 isn't twice 30? Or would it?
But, why would you want to know? How about starting it before going to bed, then seeing how far it went when you got up? More questions than answers, sorry . . .
Rather than Fritz, if you spend just 1% of those resources( cpu time) on Stockfish instead, you can get equivalent quality of chess. ( Tests proved in TCEC)
"Fritz 17 has a powerful engine"
So you're bad at both english and chess. Good for you.
That's not a useful question.
I don't know much about engines, but wouldn't it take longer in the mid-game with more pieces and shorter in the end-game with only a few pieces. And, is the time exponential? If it takes 3 minutes for 30, wouldn't it take much, much longer to get to 50 than just doubling to 6 minutes even though 50 isn't twice 30? Or would it?
But, why would you want to know? How about starting it before going to bed, then seeing how far it went when you got up? More questions than answers, sorry . . .
yes it would take longer analysing a mid game position than an endgame.