How long does it take you to reach 2000?

Stop the fantasy. Nobody believes you. 2150 rapid on chesscom is most likely weaker than a titled master but you would get mangled by a 2150 on here. We all also know that you didn't play a 2150 FIDE NM because that doesn't exist. NM is not an international title and isn't recognized by FIDE. We also know that you didn't mean CM because 2150 is not a high enough rating to be a CM nor a NM in the US or Canada or any federation that I can think of.

I'm going to stay out of the rest of the argument here ... but regarding this point, it's entirely reasonable for an NM to be around 2100 FIDE or so.

In the U.S. and Canada, at least, there aren't as many FIDE-rated events to play in, depending on where you live. So it's often the case that one's national rating (USCF or CFC) is higher, while their FIDE rating lags behind ...

Being 2150 fide and a USCF NM is entirely possible but not a 2150 "fide NM" as such a title doesn't exist.

I would be absolutely useless over the board, I rarely play Rapid as it is, too slow for me, what would I do at a table in a 3 hour match, can't whip my phone out and start scrolling or anything, I'd be bored senseless, you have to made of certain material to have that kind of patience. That said I've never tried it. I've won 515 games by timeout / dirty flagging in blitz and lost 183, can't really adopt that strategy in classical games. But it is true, the true test of one's ability is over the board, not on here. Ability and patience, you'd have to be seriously committed and most of us just don't have the time.

I agree with most but the last part. Most people don't exclusively play one or the other. The pool is still the same players.

and the NM i played OTB has a chess.com bullet rating of 2150, but i dont know his actual OTB rating...

i eventually got up to about 1900, then my gmail got hacked and i had to create another, which i eventually got to the mid/late 1900s and eventually to 2000. then i quit for about 4 months. which is why im not as strong as i was

i request that you dont share the names please.

I played with a Super GM named Jorge Cori #132 in the world at the other platform. Two classic games I find him not that strong. But I lost both games. Same with why can't you reach 2000 and here and of course you cannot beat me even you find a 2000 weak.

what?

@AngryPuffer I said how can you say 2000 is weak when you cannot even reach 1700.

read the forum

@AngryPuffer Read your comments. This is one, "yeah this is shockingly true. I played some 2150s on here and they didnt seem super strong as i expected them to be, but when i plyed a 2150 fide NM from a chess club, he was much more difficult to crack and he definitely knew what he was doing which led him to win an endgame" +++ BE A 2000 FIRST BEFORE YOU SAY WE ARE WEAK. IF WE ARE WEAK THEN WHAT ARE YOU STRONG?

i showed some games where i beat people over 2000 and above. you want me to show more?

@AngryPuffer ok show me games. Show more I haven't seen the games you beat 2000 players. Am waiting.

"Removed name" does that mean account caught cheating?

im not going to share the username of that account

@AngryPuffer no need it show on the accuracies percentage.