Forums

How many times did you lose?

Sort:
shepi13

I went 0-4 in my first OTB tournament too. And that was after I had been playing about a month. I ended up with a rating of 694 Laughing.

ollave
LelaCrosby wrote:

In australia do people use ':' instead of '*'? 

i.e. :sigh: instead of *sigh* as we do in America (atleast most people I know in America).

Not aware of any general rule. Probably most people use asterisks. A leftover from some online instant messaging system or similar, perhaps. I suspect I'm not even consistent. Perhaps it's emphais: '*' is stronger than ':'. And we're drifting well off topic. :-)

royalbishop

('*') ^ ('*')  looking for a better way to use it.

MSteen

I lost a lot! Many years ago (about 30+), when I first got serious about improving, I played one of the early chess computers obsessively. I got to the point where I could beat it on its highest level (probably about 1000) on a regular basis. So I decided to spread my wings at our local chess club and show those duffers how the game was really played.

Needless to say, I got pasted over and over and over again. One time, in fact, I managed to capture the resident 1900's queen, and STILL lost the game. Gradually I improved and started winning some games.

It's a journey with no end, but, believe me, you will improve. Just don't play blitz until you're confident at online and standard.

x-5058622868
royalbishop wrote:

('*') ^ ('*')  looking for a better way to use it.

How about...  ('*')=^._.^=('*')  Kitty was here!

x-5058622868
red-lady wrote:

 

My Games Against:

0W / 7L / 0D

 

Next time he's not coming out in one piece though! 

I hear he's not a good player. Make mince meat out of him next time!

flatters1

I lost almost every game until I had been playing about 6 months.  It got to the point that I didn't think of wins and losses...  my goal became an effort to stay in the game for more than 20 moves.  That way I could tell myself I was getting better as the number of moves I could hold out for got larger.  Gradually the wins just started happening.  Stay with it. I think with your serious thought about your performance you have real potential!

zackp93

I have mentioned to stay in the game a few games for awhile, but my strategy isn't always there. I just came in 5th in a Blitz tournament, but that's because two people abandoned and I lost the rest! Imagine if I would have actually won some! hahaha. I find myself having difficulty getting my pieces in the middle without everything getting captured by a Queen. Time to start studying up again!

flatters1

Chess can really be a humbling experience.  Persistence and a thick skin help, I think.  If you can deal with some brutally honest criticism, you could put a game or two of yours onto the forum.  The center losses to your opponent would, I think, be quickly solved. 

zackp93

Okay, I will do that. I don't mind brutal honesty, I just gotta figure this all out. Starting to memorize the openings the study plan mentions so I can at least see what my opponent is doing.

zackp93

Here is a match I lost last night that I had been doing okay in, but my middle and end game ruined it (and my start wasn't very strong either):



zackp93

And here is one more from today. My big mistake was getting an early check which prevented me from castling right in the beginning.

flatters1

That's good.  I use the study plan myself and think it helpful.  I have a good feeling about your progress.

ticcherr

jus out of curiousity do u go over urgames nd anotate nd use an engine to check thru as well???

flatters1

I would like someone better than me to look at your games. In the first game I liked your first 10 moves. Your king is protected, your pieces are centered and I think you have decent development.    But, in the first (Move 11)I think I would have taken his pawn at F7 with my knight to fork his queen and rooks.  Don't know why he did not take your hanging knight with his queen next move. Comments anyone?

zackp93

Flatters1, I'm not sure why. I was pretty confident in that game but of course did lose. I think maybe my idea was that their queen would capture the knight, then would be able to use the bishop to capture more, but not totally sure about that. I think the first one had a good opening, but from there I wasn't exactly sure how to go about the defending process as much as I did within the beginning. I'm getting much better at getting the pieces out, but making the decision to take pieces or defend with the purpose of higher gain? Well, I'll get there.

zackp93

Thank you Kombaiyashii, that is something I will look into (the book). All I need to do is keep playing and I'm sure I'll improve in this environment!

topJKMonkey

In person I've lost a seemingly infinite amount of times, although I've managed to get better and haven't lost against any of my opponents IRL in several months. On here it's a different story, I think I've only won twice on here and that was only because the other person timed out. Seems like I'm better in person than I am on here and I don't know why.

 

 

Tantale

Capablanca had not lost a game in 11 years

I have not lost a game since last evening ...

TheCherusker
zackp93 wrote:

Here is a match I lost last night that I had been doing okay in, but my middle and end game ruined it (and my start wasn't very strong either):

I looked at your game from Feb.8 and thought I'd give you some pointers:

7.0-0 ? Castling is a mistake at this point. Black's last move, 6...d5 set up the threat 7...d4, forking the White knight and bishop, winning a piece. You needed to play 7.exd5 here to eliminate this threat. This fork remains possible for several moves but luckily Black never saw it.

11.Nb5? Your knight on e5 is hanging and can be captured by the Black queen. Your move, attacking the black queen almost forces Black to capture your knight. Luckily Black didn't see it.

15.Qa6? Sadly you missed a mate in two here. 15.Qa7+! Kc8 16.Qa8#. At the very least you could've also simply taken Black's knight on a2 with your queen.

16.Bxb6? Here you missed a mate in one. 16.Nxc6#

17.Qa5? Your knight on b5 is attacked by a pawn, so moving your queen just leaves it up for grabs. Better was to continue the attack with 17.Nxc6+, if then 17...Qxc6 it's mate in two 18.Ba7+ Ka8 19.Qxc6#. Also better would have been trading queens with 17.Qxb7+ Kxb7 and then taking his rook with 18.Bxd8

18.Qxb5? Better would have been to win the black rook with 18.Bxd8. Up until now you were winning, but now the tide is beginning to turn.

20.Nxf7?  Trying to fork the two black rooks. You should have taken the Black knight on a2 with your queen instead. Now you're losing.

21.d4? The Black knight on a2 is still up for grabs! 21.Qxa2 should've been played.

22...Qxb2?? Your opponent commits a fatal blunder with this pawn grab. His queen and king are on the same open file. You can now skewer them with 23.Rb3, winning the queen. Sadly you missed it.

I will stop the analysis at this point. The rest of the game no longer presented you with any opportunities to save the game.

This is hardly an in-depth analysis of your game, I merely pointed out the most obvious tactics. I would recommend you look at this game again and again until everything I pointed out to you pops right out at you.