I got another 1 (I'm pretty sure it's as I'm 700 elohttps://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/137341548698?tab=review
How rare are "brilliant" moves according to chess.com's analysis?

On my last engine it said this wasn't a brilliant move
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/137590234326?tab=review


Apparently the knight sacrifice on the 6th move is a brilliant
yes, its theory
its not theory its true i reviewed it

Apparently the knight sacrifice on the 6th move is a brilliant
yes, its theory
its not theory its true i reviewed it
It is theory since Polerio first wrote about it more than 400 years ago. It even has a wikipedia page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fried_Liver_Attack

Chess.com's brilliant moves are comparatively uncommon since the engine only recognizes them when a move is both highly effective and non-obvious, usually a deep tactic or unexpected sacrifice. They are not merely "great" moves; they are ones that exhibit inventiveness or ingenuity that even skilled players might overlook without careful consideration.
Was this written by AI?
None of it is true. A computer can't even comprehend things like "non-obvious" or "unexpected".
Instead, the definition is simple: "A sacrifice that's good".
I got 2 brilliant moves in 1 game