How to improve at 1800 + rapid, asking for advices from stronger players

LOL!

You're really so "smart" or just trolling me?

Imagine I have 2700 at 4 checks. Can I say that I'm a super GM?

For example, I found some correspondence ratings.

If you open FIDE account of top1 guy (2664 at correspondence chess) he has only 1938 FIDE classical. Do you feel the difference?

How dumb you should be to not understand that correspondence chess and real chess are COMPLETELY different?

The same applicable to that @blueemu. He's 2350 at correspondence on chess.com but can easily be total zero at real chess.

Lol, you're not wrong about the noob part

I'm average intermediate and he's noob.

I'm average intermediate and he's noob.

you already better than 99% of players continue doing what you doing, but work on your middlegame, i reccomend books Encyclopedia of chess combinations and chess middlegames by papa Polgar, the latter its my favourite middlegame book cos it has 4000 positions patterns yo must know, also listening to some good music helps, i recommend Radiohead, Nine Inch Nails and some Katy Perry

Look at this noob: @stassneyking

At some point his correspondence was 2570. Now he dropped a bit. At some point of time he was bragging at forums that "I'm 2300-2400 player". But you can see what is the real strength of that "2300-2400 player". Look at his results in real chess!

That @blueemu is the same kind of noob. He afraid to play real chess because he knows how bad he is. He afraid to play because he doesn't want to lose his last opportunity to say on forums "I'm 2350". He's "pathetic coward" type of guy.

@DejarikDreams

Strong player would never say "I'm a 2350 player" on every occasion. Just imagine Magnus Carlsen saying:"I'm 2800 player" every time! LMAO!

That noob @blueemu doing that to convince himself first of all. And of course he's not even close to that level.

TBH you guys, strong is relative. To a 1700 rated player, 2350 (online) may seem strong, but to a 2350 player (a humble one), a strong player may be CM+ (at least for me, I consider titled players to be the beginning of "strong" players). Heck, one of my friends (a GM), considers FM's to be weak players lmao. It's all relative.

TBH you guys, strong is relative. To a 1700 rated player, 2350 (online) may seem strong, but to a 2350 player (a humble one), a strong player may be CM+ (at least for me, I consider titled players to be the beginning of "strong" players). Heck, one of my friends (a GM), considers FM's to be weak players lmao. It's all relative.

Well, if he's 2350 for you then good luck. For me he's just "another noob" which cannot play real chess. I do not consider correspondence chess a real type of chess. Topic closed.