Before 2000 rating strength, I don't feel touching a computer to analyze anything but tactical mistakes or endgame kills is very useful. A engine won't tell you, white has a advantage here, cause of queenside space, and black's kingside attack will be to slow. No, it will show you a number, and it's suggested line. +0.3 tells me nothing about chess. Improving your overall knowledge on the game can be good, tactical vision, endgame knowledge, skill, positional concepts, and such. Then annotate the game without looking at Mr.Houdini, look at him after self analysis. http://www.chess.com/article/view/chess-engines-are-not-your-friend here is a article for you.
Most Recent
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic
To improve my chess, I like the idea of going through my games, where I can assess what I did right, wrong, when I was slow making a move and why etc.
I use Fritz 13 to play chess on Playchess.com and I know it has a good interface. So, with that in mind, anyone here with Fritz who annotates their games with it? Or do you use something else? What do the masters use?
Thanks,
Jon