19324 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Currently I only study tactics and feel I am getting proficient at playing open games. However when it comes to playing closed games I often lose due to trying to open it up with sacrifices. This is because closed games seem really boring and dull.
These are two closed games I played:
Can someone give me an idea on how to play closed games well?
This frustrates me to no end. Neither of those games are closed games.
Youre another chess newbie that studies tactics, and think hes another Mihail Tal. If all youre interested in is tactics, because strategy is "dull and boring" then expect this to continue to happen. if you really want to improve your game, then you need to study the game competely, not just 1 part of it. The fact that you have no idea how to study strategy, middle game planning, etc. is frightening.
I do know something about chess strategy. How do I improve my knowledge of it?
Not entirely true.
Certain pawn breaks are "indicated" by the layout of the Pawns. For example, if your opponent (Black) has a chain of immobilized Pawns stretching from f7 to c4, you could in theory break against either e6 or c4... but f2-f4-f5 breaking against e6 is indicated. The break against c4 is a positional error.
But i could certainly imagine a layout where breakign against c4 woudl actually be much better.
Agreed, that's why I said "Not entirely true" instead of saying "Wrong".
There's a line in the French 3. Nd2 variation where breaking against White's e5-Pawn by ... f6 is perfectly playable for Black, for instance.
... but lines like that are the exception, rather than the rule.
Yeah, I agree. Although, white could just bypass all that jazz and play the french exchange. It does lead black to equality on move 3 though.
What do you know of chess straetgy now? That will help in determining what you need to work on. Some basics are:
In the middle game you need to start an attack. You have all the pieces in the game and now youshould use them to attack the opponent’s position. To start an attack you should compose a plan. There are just 2 steps which help you to find an effective plan:
• You need to find an object to attack.
• You should find a way to attack that object.
The easiest object of an attack is the opponent’s weaknesses. “Weaknesses” are the pawns or the squares on the 5th and on the 6th rank, which can’t be protected by pawns.
The central squares are the most important on the board. Because the pieces in the center are the most active, centralization provides the basic idea of a chess game – the activity of the pieces. The center squares being d4, d5, e4, e5. But also quite often “center squares” mean the huge center ( f3-c3-c6-f6).
As a general conclusion, you should attack the weaknesses in the center first.
When you decide on 3 candidate moves, you should start to calculate the variations. After changes in the position, you should make corrections in your plan. There are 2 stable factors in a chess position, material and pawn structure. When one of these changes, you need to make corrections to your plan.
Forcing moves (check, capture, threat) are the best. When you make forcing moves, you improve the position of your pieces and force your opponent to go back, and or make passive defensive moves. Forcing moves help you to realize your plan, and they don’t allow our opponent to realize his. You should alays try to make foricng moves first.
Obviously there is alot more to chess strategy, but in a nutshell this will get you started.
Fight to put rooks on open files, Knights on outposts of 5th of 6th rank, Keep Knights for closed games and bishops for open games. Use King in endgame.
When you gain material, try and keep your king safe and improve your development. Exchange to simplify position and avoid counterplay.
Limit pawn islands and attack weak squares and pawns by creating pawn islands in their camp.
Choose a target in the middle game and keep threatening it ( backward pawn, isolated pawn, weak squares)
Only move pawns up when needed and try to gain space. When you have more space, keep grabbing more on other areas.
Forcing moves often lead to combinations which gain material or endanger the king. The best forcing move is the threat of mate.
Thats what I know.
From the games you showed, it looks like your biggest problem is TACTICS, not strategy. Your problem is that you make tactical mistakes, not positional ones. It will take practice to avoid such blunders. In one game your biggest mistake is losing your rook to a tactic. In another game, you make a mistake when trying to fork your opponent's queen and a pawn, allowing your opponent to gobble up all your queenside pawns. Then you let him promote to a queen for free. Those are tactical mistakes.
You should take a look at http://home.comcast.net/~danheisman/Events_Books/General_Book_Guide.htm and purchase Chess Tactics for Students, using the book as Dan Heisman recommends on the website I gave you. Your positional understanding is probably fine for your level.
I don't know why, but most chessplayers far underestimate their positional skill. Positional skill at the GM level takes some creativity, but at my level, it's
I second this. This is probably all you need at your level, though an understanding of knights vs. bishops and outpost could be helpful. Otherwise, focus on your tactical skill. If you really want to enhance your positional understanding, play the closed ruy lopez with both colors once you understand plans for both sides.
You don´t need to play closed games against a positional player, u play only openings very agressive, gambits, crazy attacks to open de positions, and you won´t have any problem .
"crazy attacks"...and you wont have any probem?
I do around an hour of tactics a day. However, I realised that I was extremely tired and dehydrated when playing the game, so I didn't really want to play it, but due to online chess addiction, I kept playing and made some mistakes I wouldn't make if I was playing properly. Thanks for the advise!
8/25/2016 - Around The Way
by mjm16 2 minutes ago
KID with 1...e5 against the English
by Rob3rtJamesFischer 5 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by mdinnerspace 5 minutes ago
If You Could Go to Dinner with Any Chess Player, Who'd You Pick?
by Shravani_Patil 5 minutes ago
11/24/2007 - Magnificent Mate in 7
by applemonkey3 17 minutes ago
Tired of sandbagging players
by aln67 18 minutes ago
Question about computer analysis
by baddogno 21 minutes ago
Which opening system to chose?
by SuirenBoid 26 minutes ago
Jealous of other Success
by BlunderLots 29 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Spacebux 53 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!