Intentionally depriving the site of their opportunity to generate revenue by blocking the sites ability to generate that revenue, whilst still choosing to reap the benefit of the site is not an ethical choice.
I didn't do it intentionally - my adblocker was downloaded to watch illegal movies, not to screw over chess.com.
On the flip side, I do give back by contributing quality posts like this.
Why not contribute with another quality post by giving us the link where you watch illegal movies?
Everyone knows how free sites are able to stay free. They generate revenue from advertisers. You can ethically choose not to patronize the advertisers.
Intentionally depriving the site of their opportunity to generate revenue by blocking the sites ability to generate that revenue, whilst still choosing to reap the benefit of the site is not an ethical choice.
A life worth living is not about saying "I know I haven't done anything to deserve it, but look what I got away with!" Unfortunately, that is the shameful point of the original post in this string.