Forums

How to tell if someone is a tactical or a positional player?

Sort:
KeSetoKaiba
IMBacon wrote:

"...the tactical player tends to enjoy open tactical messes and sometimes King hunts."

You do understand that tactics flow from a superior position?  And how do you get a superior position?

By playing good sound strategy...aka...Positional chess.

Do you not think that "positional" players go after the king also?

Of course! This alludes to what I noted earlier (IF the options were "equal") A forced mate via King hunt for example should be pursued regardless of play preference. Furthermore, "You do understand that tactics flow from a superior position?" Yes, I know Bobby Fischer's words well. In fact, I am currently reading "My Memorable 60 Games".

RhythmOfTheKnight0021

littleLizz wrote:

The best way to see if a player is ''tactical''(aggressive) is to look at the opening they start with. If they play the Caro-Kann or Stonewall Dutch, for example, then they are likely not too aggressive. If they play the Grob Attack, the King's Gambit, or Sicilian Dragon, then it is quite likely that they are aggressive(although they might also be playing those openings because they know a lot of theory on them).

 

I say "aggressive" and not "tactical" because a tactical player simply means someone who is good at spotting mistakes, and the 1200-1400 guys you are talking about will ruin their own position just to try and get you to make a mistake. Don't panic, don't leave your King by itself, and get a strong center, and you will find that they will usually have no idea what to do.

Don't forget the Leningrad Dutch for tactical openings! Also the Benoni or King's Indian Defence... or the Grünfeld.

little_guinea_pig
TremaniSunChild wrote:

 

littleLizz wrote:

 

The best way to see if a player is ''tactical''(aggressive) is to look at the opening they start with. If they play the Caro-Kann or Stonewall Dutch, for example, then they are likely not too aggressive. If they play the Grob Attack, the King's Gambit, or Sicilian Dragon, then it is quite likely that they are aggressive(although they might also be playing those openings because they know a lot of theory on them).

 

I say "aggressive" and not "tactical" because a tactical player simply means someone who is good at spotting mistakes, and the 1200-1400 guys you are talking about will ruin their own position just to try and get you to make a mistake. Don't panic, don't leave your King by itself, and get a strong center, and you will find that they will usually have no idea what to do.

 

Don't forget the Leningrad Dutch for tactical openings! Also the Benoni or King's Indian Defence... or the Grünfeld.

 

The openings I gave are just examples, there are many more positional and tactical openings. Of course, it helps if you can recognize the openings for what they are.

little_guinea_pig

[DELETED]

IMKeto
littleLizz wrote:

Another good way to tell if a person is aggressive is if, as soon as you castle, they start moving every single one of their pieces to the side where your king is!

In one word...Wrong.

MikeZeggelaar

I cracked 2100 in over the board play and I asked this same question to a 2300 and he said that we were all to weak to define ourselves by a style.  Even sharping openings can lead to positional games and positional openings can lead to sharp play.

kindaspongey

"... You should prepare your repertoire according to your own chess tastes and style. ..." - GM Artur Yusupov (2008)

little_guinea_pig
IMBacon wrote:
littleLizz wrote:

Another good way to tell if a person is aggressive is if, as soon as you castle, they start moving every single one of their pieces to the side where your king is!

In one word...Wrong.

[DELETED]

IMKeto
littleLizz wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
littleLizz wrote:

Another good way to tell if a person is aggressive is if, as soon as you castle, they start moving every single one of their pieces to the side where your king is!

In one word...Wrong.

Sorry, I meant to phrase that better. It sounds like I'm saying that ANY aggressive player would do that(which, of course, is completely wrong). If players do that, then it means they are aggressive, and also very stupid! 

Stop...you just keep digging a deeper hole.

little_guinea_pig

What can you except from a 1100 player? But yes, reading my own comments, I am speechless about my stupidity.  Why am I even trying?

little_guinea_pig

There, I fixed my idiocy, I'm getting out of this forum before I make myself feel like a fool again! 

IMKeto
littleLizz wrote:

What can you except from a 1100 player? But yes, reading my own comments, I am speechless about my stupidity.  Why am I even trying?

lol...Youre not stupid.  Youre just stuck in that mentality of having to label everything.  Yea...Yea...I know it sounds cool to use labels like: "Tactical" "Aggressive" "Positional" "Strategy" etc.  But honestly at your level, and even at my level the only "style" we have is called Blundering.  I just don't do it as often as you do :-)  Quit worrying about having to label everything, and concentrate on getting better at the game.

little_guinea_pig

"The only style we have is called Blundering"... the wisest thing ever said on Chess.com!

kindaspongey

"... You should prepare your repertoire according to your own chess tastes and style. ..." - GM Artur Yusupov (2008)