I don't pay a lot of attention to until the endgame.
Um, pay attention earlier? If you lose a pawn in the opening and never get it back, you'll be a pawn down in the endgame.
I don't pay a lot of attention to until the endgame.
Um, pay attention earlier? If you lose a pawn in the opening and never get it back, you'll be a pawn down in the endgame.
When i was younger i would not worry about losing a pawn now and then, but after losing countless games because of that one pawn i learned to value the little guys alot more. Try to pay attention from move one waiting till the endgame can be very costly.
The nine pawn strategy. I think I read about that in a chess book somewhere. I'll for sure try that.
I wasn't sure what kind of comments i'd get on this thread, but it seems pretty plain I should stop whining, and play the game. Perhaps even try and capture a pawn if I lose one.
I have 2 rooks....I could actually start with 10 pawns....
Being down a pawn will often bite you in the endgame. You must learn not to hang pawns. But there's much more you can do to improve your game. Have you studied K+P vs K and K+R+P vs K+R endgames? A knowledge of those can help you draw when you're down a pawn and help you win when you're up a pawn.
Check my blog--I've written many articles that can help you. Also check the Chesskids lessons page, or pick up a good endgame book. :)
I am always down a pawn too.
My openings are: Kings Gambit, Danish Gambit, Scotch Gambit, Smith-Morra Gambit, and as black I play the Center-Counter Defense.
Does anyone have any insight to share with me here?
My openning and middle game always seem to cost me more pawns than my opponent; a development I don't pay a lot of attention to until the endgame. Am I undervaluing the piece? Should I always look to keep material levels equal if I must lose a piece? Should I not worry too much about it if my position seems stronger?
Any and all thoughts are welcome.