I am bored with Chess

dumb = stupid. Now, there is dumber than dumb.   I'm not sure if those poor people could improve much, if any, at chess. But it's not easy being stupid, so it's not nice to pick on them.

So, stupid people can't get good at chess? Can you be stupid in some things but smart at chess? I'm thinking about multiple intelligences here, i.e., stupid in sports - smart at math.

Kissinger, just turn the page...of the phonebook of life...to D...as in Desire Doughnuts for Dunkin'...you will find...your Destiny...

LOL

Welcme to the Chess Club !!

I was in Chicago twice. The Dunkin Doughnuts coffee kicks butt over Starbucks.

ummmmm.... donuts

ah but...you see...in order to play for future marketplaces you need to aggress the improvement in which you are standing on right now to appreciate the intricacies of future improvement strategies...

So you're saying you play piano perfectly. You're joking.

That's not a question. I'm telling you: you are, in fact, joking. Piano can't be perfected. Chess has a better chance of being perfected than piano, and I'm sure we all agree that chess won't be "solved" in the foreseeable future. The phrase "practice makes perfect" is almost universally rejected in favor of the much truer "Practice makes permanent."

A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.

 That's funny manavendra. It feels good to be able to understand one of your posts.

he does it on purpose i bet..u cannot argue with that which u cannot understand....

 yup. Big B00bs = Big IQ. FACT.  ..(science says so)

You can’t just look at Chess as a collection of features like tactics, strategies, etc.; some of the features make no sense in isolation. You can only use the sum of the parts if you are thinking about Winning, not simply playing.

And to understand Chess this way, you must understand the problems with Chess and with playing in general. This thread discusses Chess player's problems, why they are problems, and the approach Chess.com has taken to solve such problems. Thus, the set of features I explained in each comment is based on the way that I see a particular type of problem being solved with the help of Chess.

In this way I hope to move you, a little at a time, from understanding Chess to
the point where the Chess mindset becomes your native tongue. Throughout, I’ll be taking the attitude that you want to build a model in your head that allows you to understand the Chess language all the way down to the bare metal (not B00bs); if you encounter a puzzle, you’ll be able to feed it to your model and deduce the answer. I will try to convey to you the insights that have rearranged my brain to make me start “thinking in (Real) Chess.”

 I'll alert the media.

Thanks!!

@manavendra 
you should really read the Art of Learning a book by Josh Waitzkin. I am sorry I mention him a lot right now but I have just read this book. maybe this book can give you the answer to what you want. It is not a chess book, it is a book about learning in general and to deal with tournament psychology. How to make chess and life go hand  in hand.

however I doubt that you ever will be able to read a position like you read a page in a book.

but I believe that every position is governed by principles that apply to virtually every position.

you just need to find the right principles to follow.

one simple principle "never take out your queen to early"

and each principle that is violated will be punished.

if your opponent move the queen more than once in the opening - there must be a way to punish your opponent.

I believe GM Dzindzichashvili said that.

But looking only at principles—and strengthened connections between Chess pieces—may not be enough to explain Chess. The great secret of Chess is that it mostly encodes the relationships between pieces more than the details of the pieces themselves. When you memorize an opening, you encode the relationships between the pieces, not the pieces per se, which is why you can easily play the game in a different key.

To understand chess principles you have to understand two things: #1 - that you have a TRUE principle that perfectly represents your strength of play, and #2 - that that TRUE principles will never be known and so we have to use statistics to get as close as possible to the truth.

He is bored with chess and gonna quit but has 29 games in progress and only talks about quitting endlessly...... hhhmmmmmmmm , are you a politician by chance ?

 Who in the world would this be I wonder ?!