It is a very good site and 1900 is not bad. Not very good etiquette to speak about a rival site over here though...
Hey this is my main site for online chess games and this site isnt that bad
Theres nothing wrong with saying Chess.com is not #1 in every chess feature they have.. Live games is sub par compared to the main blitz sites and online games is the best in here. This is also one of the best tactic sites but not the best tactic site IMHO.
Anyone elses opinion, please?
I know this might not be a great question but is CT ratings reliable enough even at 2000 ish ( I know reaching 2500-3200 in online sites are easy enough for players that are near master or master level in real life due to many factors inflating online rating
I'm 14 and about to be 15 this september
I just started CT around april and for the premium users there you can see my 1st few tactics sucked and now i am getting my rating up due to puzzle streaks and i do that whenever i can
Should I be proud of myself of getting about CT 1900 standard rating after 2 months of training from CT?
( I wasnt a master before going to that site, you can see my 1st few tactics sucked so badly for a 1200 player)
Or should i not feel about it that much and think "I am doing fine, no more no less"
about 14 years old and i improved a lot on that site in just approx 2 months. Do you guys think that means alot?
( Oh and i ain't saying chess.com is bad. Chess.com is better overall but CT is very very specialized in tactics so i like the tactics there better and they dont have online games lol)
What do you guys think?\
http://chesstempo.com/chess-statistics/xdavex