I am SO angry with this game...
Sort:
The word refuted is wrong, it's the worst neutralise you need to look at it, engines easily neutralise the Kings Gambit, and you just have to study the lines so that you get out of the opening in a decent position and not a lost one, I've stuggled against it and I'm starting to study how to play against it as well. Also Fischer playing the Kings's gabmit is not relevant, engines have taken over chess and his opponents did not have the luxery to study such nuetralisations of this gambit.
Aug 15, 2023
0
#24
RopemakerStreet wrote:
The word refuted is wrong, it's the worst neutralise you need to look at it, engines easily neutralise the Kings Gambit, and you just have to study the lines so that you get out of the opening in a decent position and not a lost one, I've stuggled against it and I'm starting to study how to play against it as well. Also Fischer playing the Kings's gabmit is not relevant, engines have taken over chess and his opponents did not have the luxery to study such nuetralisations of this gambit.
Think you're in the wrong forum with this one 
you ccan enjoy playing the kings gambit as long as you know anyone decently prepared will simply neutralise the gambit.
Aug 15, 2023
0
#26
RopemakerStreet wrote:
you ccan enjoy playing the kings gambit as long as you know anyone decently prepared will simply neutralise the gambit.
Sure, but that's the case for most openings that aren't the Spanish, Italian or Queen's Gambit....
But you do get games like this:
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
RopemakerStreet wrote:
you ccan enjoy playing the kings gambit as long as you know anyone decently prepared will simply neutralise the gambit.
Sure, but that's the case for most openings that aren't the Spanish, Italian or Queen's Gambit....
But you do get games like this:
Only if ur opponent is noob
Aug 15, 2023
0
#28
@cogadhintreach noob means “new player”, not bad player. My opp’s account is from 2010. QED, not a noob
Kudos to your opponent for not resigning "out of respect." If they had just quit after 10.Qxa5, you would have learned nothing from this game. As it was, you got an excellent lesson in what it takes to win a "won" game. It's not as easy as it sounds, is it?
Aug 15, 2023
0
#30
@laskersnephew that is correct, though you’ll forgive me if I’m slightly less inclined to be told about what chess lesson I’ve learned from someone 300 points of rating lower than me.
Forgiven!
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
@laskersnephew that is correct, though you’ll forgive me if I’m slightly less inclined to be told about what chess lesson I’ve learned from someone 300 points of rating lower than me.
Ur 1800 😅 stop acting all high and mighty and accept every piece of advice u can get
Lol. Why is he trying to improve if he cannot flex? I think that's totally fine as long as it's not at extremely rude level
Aug 15, 2023
0
#34
cogadhtintreach wrote:
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
@laskersnephew that is correct, though you’ll forgive me if I’m slightly less inclined to be told about what chess lesson I’ve learned from someone 300 points of rating lower than me.
Ur 1800 😅 stop acting all high and mighty and accept every piece of advice u can get
Oh yeah, I'm sure you'd be open to soooooo much advice from a 1700, wouldn't you. Think your comments through, man. See how the guy I was talking to wasn't offended? Because it's a fair comment.
Aug 15, 2023
0
#35
@fissionfowl I agree. There is no benefit to Qc7+. It allows black to develop a piece and make it hard for the white queen to escape.
don't be angry, see where you can improve in your games